3-D? Smee-D, looks like it was a fad...this time around... - High-Def Digest Forums
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-14-2012, 12:40 PM
Sbert's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,069
Default 3-D? Smee-D, looks like it was a fad...this time around...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/13/tech/g...ted/index.html

Quote:
(CNN) -- The evidence that people are getting tired of 3-D continues to pile up.
The latest bad news comes from Nintendo president Satoru Iwata, who in an interview with The Independent admitted that interest in 3-D is "perhaps slightly on the wane again."

Although Nintendo will continue to offer 3-D in its handheld gaming devices, it won't be a major selling point, says Iwata:
"So, now we've created the 3DS and 3DS XL and also have some games out there that are really using that 3-D effect that we can see, from my point of view, that it's an important element. But as human beings are this kind of surprise effect wears off quickly, and just [having] this 3-D stereoscopic effect isn't going to keep people excited."
Iwata's view that 3-D is "slightly on the wane" seems like an understatement. You needn't look far for other signs that 3-D is failing.
Consider the box office. Although studios released 19 more 3-D movies in 2011 than the year before, 3-D box office revenue fell by 18% in the U.S., or about $400 million, according to the Motion Picture Association of America.
Last month, 3-D attendance hit a record low for the opening weekend of Pixar's "Brave," with just 32% of revenues coming from 3-D, says the Hollywood Reporter. While "The Avengers" fared better, with a little more than half of sales coming from 3-D tickets, it's not even close to the 83% 3-D revenue that "Avatar" enjoyed in December 2009. The days where you absolutely had to see a hit movie in 3-D are over.
The 3-D TV situation isn't much better. Sales of 3-D televisions are on the rise in the U.S. according to The NPD Group, but only 14% of consumers who might buy a TV in the next six months say 3-D is a "must-have" feature.
Most people just think of it as future-proofing something that might be nice to have. Even Samsung, the world's largest TV maker, admits that 3-D TV hasn't lived up to the hype, and the company is now exalting web-connected smart TVs as its next big source of growth.
It's easy to guess why 3-D is struggling in movies and television sets: People don't want to be burdened with 3-D glasses, or worry about eye strain, and pay a premium for the privilege.
But Nintendo's cooling attitude toward glasses-free 3-D signals a deeper problem: Even once you remove the pesky glasses, the novelty of 3-D wears off. That's a pretty staggering admission from a company that put the term "3D" in the name of its handheld.
At least with 3-D hype deflated, media and tech companies can focus on more important things. Samsung can put more effort into smart TV. Nintendo can work on adding more features and new entertainment apps to the 3DS. I know this is a stretch, but maybe Hollywood can stop putting out so many bad movies.
Those all seem like better alternatives than fooling your eyes into seeing another dimension.
This article originally appeared on Time.com: The 3-D hype bubble Is now completely busted
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2012, 06:47 PM
tiberius's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 404
Default

I think that using Avatar as a yardstick is a poor choice as Avatar was a huge financial success, regardless of 3D. I don't think Avatar is very representative of how well 3D movies sell generally.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2012, 08:25 PM
towergrove's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,694
Default

I think 3D is here to stay. Fortunately if you like it, it will be available- if you dont, you have the 2D option. Giving consumers choice is a wonderful thing!

Im looking forward to Creature from the Black Lagoon, Dial M for Murder and just announced at comic con and will be coming soon House of Wax to Blu Ray.

Last edited by towergrove; 07-17-2012 at 09:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2012, 10:42 PM
cakefoo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,418
Default

3D is seasonal. Same summer dip happened last year.





The theory is that with so many big releases people have to sacrifice 3D sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-18-2012, 02:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,134
Default

Using avatar as a yardstick for 3D viewing is like using Avatar as a yardstick for movie watching. Much is going to pale in comparison, and it's just an unrealistic, unfair one.

That said, the studios should be concerned about declining 3D ratios but 1 of the proposals I remember hearing about earlier this year was to eliminate the $3 or so premium for 3D and just price all movies more expensively. I guess if your goal is to encourage 3D watching, without regard for other impacts, that's a good idea perhaps.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-18-2012, 08:29 AM
towergrove's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,694
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h0mi View Post
Using avatar as a yardstick for 3D viewing is like using Avatar as a yardstick for movie watching. Much is going to pale in comparison, and it's just an unrealistic, unfair one.

That said, the studios should be concerned about declining 3D ratios but 1 of the proposals I remember hearing about earlier this year was to eliminate the $3 or so premium for 3D and just price all movies more expensively. I guess if your goal is to encourage 3D watching, without regard for other impacts, that's a good idea perhaps.
Extra cost is a major hurdle. Lowering prices would probably help like you suggest.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2012, 01:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,134
Default

Grrr my post got iped out.

As I was saying, I thought the studios were going to pressure theater owners (or theater owners were doing this on their own?) to raise the price of non 3D tickets so that there's no more premium for 3D. Not exactly the sort of thing I'd support. It would probably stop people from avoiding 3D for being more expensive but they'd turn around and avoid the movie altogether. $14+ for a movie ticket vs $11?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2012, 01:55 PM
shesha's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Default

Tron Legacy was and will be my last 3D movie ever. I loved it for Avatar, it has been stupid in every other form I saw it in.

No thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2012, 02:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 129
Default

I will almost always choose the 3D version of a blu-ray over the regular. Just to have the option of watching it both ways. My next purchase is Avengers 3D, already preordered.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-14-2012, 05:07 PM
FreyTheater3D's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 57
Default

3D is not going away anytime soon, much to the chagrin of the "haters"... Threads like this should really be deleted right away by a mod, as the ONLY reason to start this kind of thread is to antagonize those with an opposite view and see how vicious the posts will get arguing back and forth... :blackeye3:

That being said, I upgraded to a 3D projector in my theater exactly 6 months ago, and since then I have purchased a total of 64 3D blu-rays and only 8 2D movies... :sarcastic08:
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Like Assasin's Creed? Well looks like most the talent left to THQ. Godstar Game Room 19 04-01-2011 03:23 PM
Brits loving their 360 games this time around... miDnIghtEr Gaming Smackdown 67 10-05-2009 11:30 PM
What goes around comes around: The bell tolls for thee, WB... Gargamel HD DVD Software General Discussion 27 08-30-2008 06:23 AM
Rumor Mole Xbox 360 price cut around the time GTA 4 drops. Master X Gaming Smackdown 22 10-22-2007 08:59 AM
NYK Eats around Time Square firelizard The Water Cooler 1 04-07-2007 01:02 AM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off