Bill that could 'break the Internet' delayed until 2012 - High-Def Digest Forums
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-23-2011, 01:23 AM
ack_bak's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 20,623
Default Bill that could 'break the Internet' delayed until 2012

So much for the digital world offering studios more protection than an optical disc....

And let's be honest these sites could be setup and moved easily within 24-48 hours and by the time a judge went after a site, it would just be somewhere else. There are millions and millions of computers that are globally controlled by botnet controllers.

Piracy is not going anywhere.

Bill that could 'break the Internet' delayed until 2012

A congressional vote on an anti-piracy bill that Internet heavyweights like Google say would be an online Armageddon has been delayed until 2012.

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), which was introduced in the House of Representatives in late October, aims to crack down on copyright infringement. Its targets include "rogue" overseas sites like torrent hub The Pirate Bay, which essentially operate as a free bazaar for illegal downloads of movies, music, TV shows and other digital content.

The legislation has turned into a Hollywood-vs-Silicon Valley battle royale, with media companies uniting in favor of it and tech's power players throwing their might into opposing it.

A House of Representatives committee met last week to discuss proposed amendments to the bill, a process that must be completed before the committee can decide whether to pass the legislation on to the full House for a vote. Dozens of amendments were proposed, extending the markup process.

The House began its holiday recess on Wednesday. An aide for the bill's lead sponsor, Texas Republican Lamar Smith, said the amendment review has been postponed until next year.

Observers expect the bill to pass the committee and move on to a full House vote, but the proposed law's scope and content are the subject of active debate -- and carving out time on the House's packed legislative calendar isn't easy. Smith's office said its current estimate is that the bill won't go to the full House for a vote until March.

A similar bill called the Protect IP Act was approved by a Senate committee in May and is now pending before the full Senate.

Content creators have for years battled against rampant piracy, but it's hard for U.S. companies to go after foreign sites and their operators. SOPA and its cousin in the Senate aim to cut off those sites' air supply by requiring Internet search engines, payment processors, ad networks and other providers to "withhold services" from infringing sites.

A long list of tech companies, including Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500), eBay (EBAY, Fortune 500) and Facebook, say that protecting content is a worthy goal but that SOPA is rife with unintended consequences.

SOPA's implications: If SOPA passes, copyright holders would be able to complain to law enforcement officials and get websites shut down. Search engines and other providers would have to block "rogue" sites when ordered to do so by a judge.

It would be a reversal of the philosophy behind the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which mandates that companies "act in good faith" when a copyright holder asks them to remove pirated content.

Under SOPA, sites could be punished for hosting that content in the first place -- and Internet companies are worried that they could be held liable for users' actions. For example, Google could face punishment if a pirated TV show is uploaded to YouTube.

Critics battle back: SOPA has drawn support from groups including the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America, which say that online piracy leads to U.S. job losses by depriving content creators of income.

Proponents of the bill dismiss accusations of censorship, saying that the legislation is meant to revamp a broken system that doesn't adequately prevent criminal behavior.

But SOPA's critics say that say that the bill's backers don't understand the Internet, and therefore don't appreciate the implications of the legislation they're considering.

Vice's Motherboard blog on Friday published a widely shared article called "Dear Congress, It's No Longer OK To Not Know How The Internet Works." The author blasted legislators for "in many cases an outright refusal to understand what is undoubtedly a complex issue dealing with highly-sensitive technologies."

Other critics have posted online diatribes questioning the constitutionality of SOPA, saying the bill will "break" or "destroy the Internet as we know it."

Hundreds of sites -- including Tumblr, BoingBoing, Reddit and the Electronic Frontier Foundation --- launched an awareness campaign, adopting black "STOP CENSORSHIP" logos. Google chairman Eric Schmidt calling the bill "draconian" during a speech in November.

Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) and other tech behemoths -- AOL (AOL), eBay, Facebook, LinkedIn (LNKD), Mozilla, Twitter, Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500) and Zynga (ZNGA) -- also lodged a formal complaint last month in the form of a letter sent to key Senate and House lawmakers. The letter stated that the companies "support the bills' stated goals," but that Congress should "consider more targeted ways to combat foreign 'rogue' websites."

Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of House members has proposed an alternative bill: the Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act (OPEN).

This legislation would allow rights holders to ask the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) to enforce current laws by targeting the actual content pirates. OPEN's backers have posted the draft legislation online and invited the Web community to comment on and revise the proposal.

SOPA supporters counter that the ITC doesn't have the resources for such enforcement, and that giving it those resources would be too expensive.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 05:48 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,924

Kinda funny.

Wikipedia announces they will ditch SOPA supporting GoDaddy.

Literally moments later.
GoDaddy withdraws support of SOPA
Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2011, 06:34 PM
tiberius's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 404

Originally Posted by ack_bak View Post
And let's be honest these sites could be setup and moved easily within 24-48 hours and by the time a judge went after a site, it would just be somewhere else.
My understanding of this bill is that the reason that it is such a truly awful bill and should not pass is that it would enable the executive branch of government to shut down sites without consulting with the judicial branch. In other words, it wouldn't be a judge who would go after a site, it would be those that accuse a site of infringing.

So that begs the question of why is this so bad? It is so bad because the bill removes the balance of powers that keeps our government from accumulating too much power in one sector and enabling dictatorial behaviour. Under the proposed bill, if you are accused of distributing copyrighted content you are shut down without a warrant or any other input from a court. That means that your accusers would be both police, judge, and executioner. Our system of government was established to prevent exactly this sort of behaviour.

The SOPA bill is bad in every way.
Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LOTR: Extended delayed until 2012 princedvd Blu-ray Software General Discussion 79 02-14-2010 04:12 PM
'Prison Break: The Final Break' - High-Def Digest Review Attebery Blu-ray Software General Discussion 20 08-05-2009 03:29 AM
PS3 delayed in Europe until September 07? james Gaming Smackdown 9 01-11-2007 12:48 PM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off