[barren25992]

I was wondering if anyone has the Panasonic Blu-Ray DMP-BD30k and has played the movie 300 on it yet? It looked crappy, it looked like there was sand all over the place. Has anyone seen this too? Let me know.

[kak]

Its the crap known as 'directors intent.' You're not the only one that thinks this movie looks like garbage.

[Godstar]

Good lord. I thought the movie looked great, but like assholes, everyones got an opinion.

[barren25992]

You did not see any of the sandy looking crap in t he movie at all?

[OSHAN]

Originally Posted by barren25992

You did not see any of the sandy looking crap in t he movie at all?

Everyone did, the director wanted it there.

[LiK]

if he meant grain, i noticed it more on my LCD but the movie looked pristine on my plasma.

[Dyers Eve]

It is supposed to have the grain look to it. The director intended it to look that way.

[cliffeman]

or as Peter Bracke said in the blu ray review "so much video noise that it seems like a swarm of mosquitoes has infested your television"

[Arkadin]

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO OMG!!
yeah that's called "grain"
btw: this movie looks amazing on my hd crt. lots of 3-d looking shots especially when she's walking with the temple like building in the background. That shot looks the best imo.

[Motorheadache]

It was shot in pure digital and the director added artificial grain to the picture, so it does look kind of odd. It still has that sharp, clear high def look though compared to the DVD version.