'Vampires Suck' - High-Def Digest Review - High-Def Digest Forums
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-2010, 05:47 PM
Attebery's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,716
Default 'Vampires Suck' - High-Def Digest Review

E has reviewed 'Vampires Suck.' He says this spoof sucks too. This Blu-ray has one ongoing video problem and unimpressive audio and extras. This is a rental at best, or just skip it.

Full review here:
http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/3884/vampiressuck.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2010, 06:27 PM
paaron46's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,788
Default

I endured this in the theaters and still have to see a therapist about it.

This runs a very close second to 'Last Airbender' for worst film of 2010.
__________________
Become a FAN of The Reel Place!

Twitter: @AaronPeck
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2010, 07:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paaron46 View Post
I endured this in the theaters and still have to see a therapist about it.

This runs a very close second to 'Last Airbender' for worst film of 2010.
*gasp* I'm not talking to you.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2010, 08:12 PM
CaptainCanuck's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,665
Default

Bah. It has it's moments and it wasn't as immature as many of these spoofs i've seen.
I wouldn't pay any more than a rental fee for it but it was nice to see someone take on the Twilight films.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2010, 08:19 PM
paaron46's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,788
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moviewizguy View Post
*gasp* I'm not talking to you.
The only reason why it comes in second is I had no expectations for 'Vampires Suck.' I knew it would suck. On the other hand I had relatively high expectations for 'Last Airbender' and they were crushed and trampled on.
__________________
Become a FAN of The Reel Place!

Twitter: @AaronPeck
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2010, 01:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paaron46 View Post
The only reason why it comes in second is I had no expectations for 'Vampires Suck.' I knew it would suck. On the other hand I had relatively high expectations for 'Last Airbender' and they were crushed and trampled on.
Fair enough.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2010, 08:39 AM
Naiera's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 407
Default

I know we don't respect her as an author, but maybe it would be nice to spell Stephenie Meyer's name correctly?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-07-2010, 11:51 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1
Default

I have to admit I was pretty impressed by your reaction to Stephenie Meyers in your Vampires Suck review. I'm sorry, but I have to ask - have you really not been paying attention lately? Vampires have been so over used, abused, denigrated, mangled and misused for so long that Stephenie Meyers hardly did anything to damage vampires. People have been "reinventing" vampires since the first vampire tale was told. Honestly, there is very little interesting going on in vampire fiction of any kind, any where. That's why so many vampire properties have to include things like werewolves. Vampires have sucked for a long time, and Stephenie Meyers had nothing to do with it. They're boring and tired. Blame over exposure for ruining vampires, not some schmaltzy teen angst-romance writer. Vampires sucked long before her.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2010, 06:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 134
Default

Forever Knight FTW!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2010, 06:18 PM
Landy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chett View Post
I have to admit I was pretty impressed by your reaction to Stephenie Meyers in your Vampires Suck review. I'm sorry, but I have to ask - have you really not been paying attention lately? Vampires have been so over used, abused, denigrated, mangled and misused for so long that Stephenie Meyers hardly did anything to damage vampires. People have been "reinventing" vampires since the first vampire tale was told. Honestly, there is very little interesting going on in vampire fiction of any kind, any where. That's why so many vampire properties have to include things like werewolves. Vampires have sucked for a long time, and Stephenie Meyers had nothing to do with it. They're boring and tired. Blame over exposure for ruining vampires, not some schmaltzy teen angst-romance writer. Vampires sucked long before her.
Perhaps, but she definitely had a hand in making them even suckier. I mean sparkly? WTF? Did she throw a dart in her room and hit a My Little Pony? Why not give them a flowing mane of pink hair and curlers?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'Planet of the Vampires' - High-Def Digest Review Attebery Blu-ray Software General Discussion 0 01-29-2015 03:42 PM
'Two Orphan Vampires' - High-Def Digest Review Attebery Blu-ray Software General Discussion 1 09-06-2012 03:36 PM
'Les Vampires (1915)' - High-Def Digest Review Landy Blu-ray Software General Discussion 6 08-31-2012 11:58 AM
'Vampires Suck: Extended Bite Me Edition' is coming November 30 Landy Blu-ray Software General Discussion 2 10-07-2010 01:11 PM
Vampires Suck Landy Blu-ray Wish Lists 4 08-13-2010 05:10 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off