-
04-05-2007 02:00 PM #61
I dont particulary mind sony there products are great and they last for a while, i also quite like microsoft a bit more then sony however and purchased a xbox 360 with the HD DVD drive, now i go into stores to purchase discs and everywhere in england appears to be crazed on bluray only one store offers HD DVD which is HMV, everywhere else is blu ray even tesco (the equivalent of americas Best Buy) are selling bluray, for europe it looks like a blu ray world
-
04-05-2007 02:08 PM #62
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Washington D.C.
- Posts
- 212
Well, LG has already made a dual format player, Blu. And while it's somewhat of a crap player that's way overpriced at $1,200 MSRP, it's certainly a start, albeit a tentative one. Similarly, Samsung is *expected* to soon jump into the fray as well (though this could be in the vein of the BB rumor mill).
-
04-05-2007 02:11 PM #63
Any high def version should offer more than the SDVD version, IMO.
And Eragon is a recent release, right?
I know it goes by studios. I'm just saying I'm surprised more people are not more offended. I hear a lot more "Ah, it's okay; I don't really want extras" as replies. I guess some people cannot admit ANY faults of their preferred format, but to me a format that is trying to convince people to stop buying DVD needs to deliver MORE than SDVD can deliver, and not just in the PQ and AQ department.Last edited by rmslives; 04-05-2007 at 02:36 PM.
-
04-05-2007 02:31 PM #64
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 715
CBUFFet? Where I dont see Jimmy Buffet! ok but on to matters at hand...
The Blu-ray surge in Europe can be explained by the HUGE PS3 launch. HD DVD was doing quite well in Europe before that so I would expect to see a prety even amout of each format in the upcoming months. So dont fret. -
04-05-2007 02:50 PM #65
Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 2,774
-
04-05-2007 02:51 PM #66
As usual, you have the ability to focus on one HD title but ignore what you know is the truth, since a lot of other BD fans have owned up to it: some BD studios are totally neglecting any worthwhile extras.
So yay for you! You can list an HD title with skimpy extras. Why is it so hard to say, "Yeah, some of the studios have stiffed us on extras"? Is it really that hard to admit when your format of choice could do something better? I have been quick to discuss HD's weaknesses - it's kind of disappointing that instead of agreeing I have a good point, you find ONE HD title to make a sarcastic response about. -
04-05-2007 02:53 PM #67
It would sure help if you showed you were responding to something instead of just rambling on in a very anti-Sony way...
Sony is a huge company so what their music divsion did, which was wrong, is something you and other Sony haters glom onto as if it is the entire reason the company exists - to break your computer. Tell me, that wasn't a M$ comuter operating system was it? And how are those X360s holding up for consumers? I have heard from more than a few very loyal X360 fans who have busted more than one system with normal use. Seems that every player has their own line of 'horrible' they put out.
It's great - if it is a choice. But, they aren't giving anyone a choice on the HD DVD side. They are forcing the extra cost onto all consumers. I personally backup my DVDs to a hard drive for transportability and then store the originals in a changer for safe keeping. My HD movies I want to keep away from damaging situations. Yay, you spent $30 and... dang, now it got a scratch because you moved it all over the place. For those not as excited as you, it's just added cost to their purchase.
So you bought a $400 Sony DVD player?
Some people have first generation Sony DVD players and still use them. My Sony DVD player is about 5 years old... my Sony VCR is about 14 years old. My POS Apex DVD player is 4 years old... My RCA TV is 13 years old. You know, sometimes stuff lasts a long time, and sometimes it doesn't. It often depends on the end user and luck, not just the product being purchased.
Sony 'forced' nothing. They include it. Wii forces people to use their non standard format. They force people to use cartridges with Gameboy. Sony forces UMD with PSP. It's a very short sighted line. The potential is there to utilize Blu-ray within gaming and really have it as a format for years to come. I agree it is more than PS3 needs, but in a couple of years the cost to add HD to video games may be just a few dollars... and neither Nintendo nor M$ will be able to offer it as a native function that developers can use fully.
Have you read how many people have posted about HD51 discs? Do you think those are going to be compatible with first... or second generation HD DVD players? I don't think it will bug ANYONE who owns a PS3 if BD-J isn't fully featured on their system. Because PS3 is so much more than just HD movies. Every HD DVD owner who has similar issues due to the HD DVD specification not being finalized is out the price of a full player in their need for an upgrade.
Good to know your friend speaks for the rest of the universe.
I believe it was Amir (M$) who said: "BD50 discs are a myth, they will not be out this year (2006) and when they do come out they will be prohibitively expensive." This is the type of stuff that is stated by HD DVD's official shills, yet some random consumer spouts their opinion and you call it gospel for all?
When you say "THEY SAY" what you really mean is that "NIELSEN STATES..." and the number right now is closer to 4 to 1. But, look at the number of titles on the street right now and Blu-ray is barely ahead of HD DVD, yet the inception to date numbers are pulling firmly away from HD DVD. No, studios care a lot more about how well things are selling, not how you can manipulate numbers to make things look bad for Blu-ray.
Yes, they are. So what? Ever hear some of the stuff that comes from M$? Toshiba, of course, nobody says much about because Toshiba is a blip on the map of CE.
So point 8 has had such an impact on your life that you decided to repeat it again as point 9. Do you stay up at night looking for Sony press releases and information just so you can scoff at it? I personally just read reviews of their products and see how they stack up against the competition, then I buy the best value for the money - Sony or other.
Toshiba has been making money on HD DVD for the past ten years? Oh pleeeeease... will you give me the link that supports this?
Oh, wait. You mean Toshiba has been doing it with DVD for years and now wants to continue on with HD. So, they changed the rules to push their proprietary format on the DVD Forum and then, with no other CE support, have gone it alone making players well after the BDA was established and the entire CE industry had committed to Blu-ray. Sure, you keep saying it was Sony who was responsible for the war... Sony.... and Panasonic... and Samsung... and Phillips.... and Pioneer... and Sharp. Toshiba is going against CE manufacturers in general, which is their right, but hardly points to Sony being the one who is dissenting.
Interesting comments, but typically slanted towards your format of choice. Also, no real substance. Why would any of this have to do with Blu-ray not winning? It's all about why you hate Sony. Great. -
04-05-2007 03:18 PM #68
Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 272
While I'm neutral on the formats, I do have some bad feelings towards Sony. If you were to put a gun to my head and say "choose" I would support HD DVD. Not because I think it's superior or can even tell a difference. But because Sony, knowingly and willingly gave us some tasty root kits. It was brought to their attention before they were released and they continued...it was brought up after the problem was on the market and they denied it for a while. And what's the fix? You get to exchange your disc for free...doesn't matter if your computer was damaged, that's just details. The very fact that this was snuck on to people's machines for deliberate purposes with the developers and others knowing full well that it was not only unethical, but could lead to severe problems is what gets me. I know it's a different division of Sony, and I do realize that MS is no sweet angel either...but the Sony thing was just insane.
And that's what doesn't make sense to me from BR fans (examples could be made for HD DVD too, but as an example I'm using BR). Here we are...many of us techies, many of us HD fans, and a number of BR supporters. You support BR blindly without looking at any history, it's a very self centered view point with blinders on to see how you've been manipulated before. How many PS3 owners even realize that Sony's focus was pushing BR with the launch of that console and not the interest in the gamers that once was. How come no one is outraged by it? And the fans of the PS3? They cheer for BR to win of course so that their purchase is justified. Again I'll state that if BR wins, then I'll happily purchase a BR player since there's no other choice...but till then I'm not cheering for either side because in the end it ultimately makes no difference to any of us. At this point we're all reduced to saying "BR is 0.03% ahead in this area or that one." MOST of the fanboys here have very very poor reasons for supporting one side or the other, stemming from the newbie users all the way up to the mods. -
04-05-2007 03:30 PM #69
Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 272
There's a wee difference between having to send in your 360 for repairs or exchanging it vs the possibility of your computer being destroyed. Hmm, let's think which one is a bit more serious.
And there's nothing wrong with making a mistake as a company. It's how you handle it that determines how consumers feel. A friend of mine rides a Kawasaki ZX-10 motorcycle. Well the first year models had a problem with the frames cracking and a few owners reported this problem. Kawasaki responded with a proactive recall on the frames in exchange for a totally new one before it became a more serious problem. Around the same time there was an incident with Yamaha motorcycles on their R1 models which thousands of owners claimed the engine would sometimes randomly cut out while they were riding...normally ok, but this caused a number of accidents when some of the riders were taking a corner. I called Yamaha (was in the market at that time for a new bike), and they denied that any such problem existed even though I'd been hearing about it for at least 6 months. To this day they have not acknowledged that any problems exists regardless of the thousands of cases.
And that's your difference in companies. Like I said...mistakes happen, it's simply how you handle them. I know it's all about profits and calculations...but at some point it's gotta be about the consumer, which at this point is the last person that Sony seems to care about. Unless you're going to tell me that with their other proprietary formats like memory cards they are somehow thinking of us and doing us a favor? Get real. -
04-05-2007 03:33 PM #70
Microsoft willingly gave us a gazillion security flaws, requires you to "activate" your computer when you change hardware, and buy a new OS when you replace your motherboard. They're a huge part of HD DVD, yet they get a pass where Sony doesn't?
The emergence of a single, high-definition format is cause for consumers, as well as the entire entertainment industry, to celebrate.
--Craig Kornblau, (President, Universal Pictures Home Entertainment), February 19, 2008
Wil Wheaton says: Don't be a dick! -
04-05-2007 03:33 PM #71
Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 238
its not just a matter of blu ray winning-its a matter of someone winning, regardless of who it is. As long as two formats exist, it will be seen as an unsafe investment by many to jump into the high def era. Competition is always good, but in this case, its also very dangerous...especially considering the fact that, to the ignorant consumer, both HD-DVD and Blu ray look nearly identical. One must win, and it would seem to me that Blu ray is in a better position to do so, as of now. Both formats fighting for years on end brings risk of the industry skipping right over both and going straight for digital distribution. Both will lose.
-
04-05-2007 03:38 PM #72
Hey, I agree with you that we should get supplements.
What I disagree with is that feature-packed releases are somehow mandatory for HD DVD. As you say, it's a studio policy. If Fox released on HD DVD you would get the same slim pickings extras-wise.
It's important to separate the studio from the format in this instance. I have yet to buy a Fox blu-ray title, they are overpriced and under-nourished with supplements. And they also enforce region coding, which, as a European, I oppose.Last edited by Kid Banana; 04-05-2007 at 03:41 PM.
-
04-05-2007 03:42 PM #73
You're right - 100%. If HD studios were being lame in this regard, I would be pissed. I'm a bit pissed that I cannot get more TrueHD tracks on HD. And again, that's a studio decision.
If you're going to boast more space for things like more extras, though: deliver the goods. More BD studios need to do that than HD ones right now, IMO. -
04-05-2007 03:50 PM #74
Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Posts
- 272
I'm not sure how intentional those security flaws are...some folks work pretty hard to find those holes. And MS doesn't get a pass either way. Tell me that there's an alternative OS out there that can battle their monopoly and you can bet that they'll become better. But what can I do...setup OSX in my dads office? Pfft, yea right. But your points are still somewhat valid which is part of the reason I'm not in a hurry to cheer HD DVD on either. The ideal would be that both formats remain and that players simply support both. Why does the format war have to be between us? Let the companies fight, and keep fighting in hope of us getting some benefit out of it.
-
04-05-2007 03:53 PM #75
I'm sure you're right that the people that DO want extras are pissed off. But, IMO, the extras are not the driving force for the new format, it's the quality titles, PQ, multiple audio tracks (LPCM, Dolby TruHD, DD, DTS, etc) and then maybe, and that's a big maybe, the extras.
This may not be true for a lot of you, but I barely have enough time to watch a movie in it's entirety. I can't name one DVD or Blu-ray that I have watched any extra content on. Although, after playing with the new sort feature in the reviews section, I see that Crank is ranked highest for HD Exclusives. Hopefully, if I can find some time I'll check that out and it may change my whole opinion on the extras. Until then, just give me my movie with a reference quality transfer and lossless audio and I will be happy.
Bringing you all the best reviews of high definition entertainment.
Founded in April 2006, High-Def Digest is the ultimate guide for High-Def enthusiasts who demand only the best that money can buy. Updated daily and in real-time, we track all high-def disc news and release dates, and review the latest disc titles.
Copyright © 2012 Internet Brands, Inc. All rights reserved.



Reply With Quote


