|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry if this is the wrong section but I really want to know. Some people say Sony, some say Sony and Phillips and some say a mix of different companies. I'd like to know the truth please.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can give you this much--I'm pretty sure Blu-ray owns me.
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
http://www.blu-raydisc.com/en.html
Quote:
__________________
Panasonic PT-AE2000U Projector, 100" Elitech Fixed Screen Onkyo SR605 receiver, HTD Level III 7.1 speaker system Samsung BD-P2500 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Also the announcement of the first meeting of the Blu-ray Disc Patent holders:
Quote:
__________________
Panasonic PT-AE2000U Projector, 100" Elitech Fixed Screen Onkyo SR605 receiver, HTD Level III 7.1 speaker system Samsung BD-P2500 |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's worth noting that Panasonic holds the most patents in the technology at this time, and it appears that the BDA will adopt Panasonics 3D Blu-ray model, so Panasonic will likely hold more patents in the technology still.
Sony holds the most patents related to the disc design structure which potentially will garner them the highest profits on the technology. Where Panasonic gets paid for every player sold, Sony gets paid for every disc produced. Per unit they get less, but overall they will get more. At least, this is my understanding after following BD for years. There are other players in BD as well, for sure, but I'm not sure if any come as close as Panasonic or Sony for patents in the technology. |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.





Linear Mode

