Go Back   High-Def Digest Forums > HD DVD Format-Specific Forums > HD DVD Software General Discussion
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2008, 12:55 PM
Attebery's Avatar
Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Default 'Bonnie & Clyde' - High-Def Digest Review

Peter's review of 'Bonnie & Clyde' has been posted. He says it's a landmark film and a must-see for any serious student of American cinema. This HD DVD release easily does the film justice, with a terrific remaster and a worthwhile package of retrospective extras. 'Bonnie & Clyde' is a must addition to your HD DVD library.

Full review here:
http://hddvd.highdefdigest.com/1270/bonnieandclyde.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-22-2008, 02:55 PM
jm9843's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Default

Quote:
The HD DVD again mirrors the Blu-ray, and offers only an English Dolby Digital 1.0 Mono track (192kbps).
Err, no mention of the HD DVD version's Dolby Digital Plus track?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:57 PM
Arturo Lugo's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by review
I think Warner is onto something here, and look forward to their future "book" releases.
Even if there are no more for HD DVDs, eh?

***

Does this version has a DD+ track?
__________________
for - 30 movies / 10 games ~ Latest: KillZone 2 ~ Looking forward to: Uncharted 2
for - 9 movies / 23 games ~ Latest: The Beatles RockBand ~ Looking forward to: Modern Warfare 2
Polaroid 2626-TLMB 26" HDTV
Onkyo TX-SR606 w/ Kenwood Speakers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:57 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Default

Thnx for the review, might pick this one up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:57 PM
Master X's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Augusta, Georgia
Buy/Sell/Trade Score: 43
Posts: 12,405
Default

If Warner HDs and Blus are the same, why review them. I rather have import reviews.
__________________
Colts 9-0
XBL: Master X 24
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-22-2008, 04:35 PM
jm9843's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arturo Lugo View Post
Does this version has a DD+ track?
It sure does. I'm not sure why it was ignored/overlooked by the reviewer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-22-2008, 05:46 PM
Josh Z's Avatar
HDD Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Master X View Post
If Warner HDs and Blus are the same, why review them. I rather have import reviews.
Only you and a small handful of other people bother to read the import HD DVD reviews. Although there may not be much forum activity around them, domestic HD DVD reviews (whether cloned from the Blu-ray or not) get decidely more page views. Thus we will continue our coverage of them.
__________________
Joshua Zyber
Critic, High-Def Digest
Contributor, Home Theater Magazine
Curator, Laserdisc Forever | Cinema Zyberdiso.
My opinions are strictly my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of this site, its owners or employees.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-22-2008, 05:48 PM
Josh Z's Avatar
HDD Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jm9843 View Post
Err, no mention of the HD DVD version's Dolby Digital Plus track?
This appears to have been an oversight.

Warner uses the lower 640 kb/s bit rate for Dolby Digital Plus, which Dolby confirms is identical to standard DD 5.1 at the same rate (as used in Blu-ray). The only difference between them is some metadata. So it's really a matter of semantics.
__________________
Joshua Zyber
Critic, High-Def Digest
Contributor, Home Theater Magazine
Curator, Laserdisc Forever | Cinema Zyberdiso.
My opinions are strictly my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of this site, its owners or employees.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-22-2008, 06:09 PM
Cochise's Avatar
.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Cochise County, Arizona
Default

I rented the BD awhile back to see if this was something I would want to pickup. "Landmark film" or not, I've never cared for it much. It looks pretty good but, while I appreciate Warner apparently did not have access to the original "source elements", it is the worst audio quality on any high-def release I've heard; it's actually been a long while since I heard a standard def DVD sound that tinny & weak.
__________________
Panasonic PT-AE2000U Projector, 100" Elitech Fixed Screen
Onkyo SR605 receiver, HTD Level III 7.1 speaker system
Samsung BD-P2500 LG BH200 - Region B / PAL,
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-22-2008, 08:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

I just placed an order for this with Amazon. I have never seen this film. I hope the high price for it is worth it, I dont think my collection would be complete without it.

I would like some opinions on how sharp this film looks on HD DVD.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-22-2008, 09:09 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kentwood, Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Z View Post
This appears to have been an oversight.

Warner uses the lower 640 kb/s bit rate for Dolby Digital Plus, which Dolby confirms is identical to standard DD 5.1 at the same rate (as used in Blu-ray). The only difference between them is some metadata. So it's really a matter of semantics.
Err... the HD DVD version of Bonnie & Clyde is still only presented in mono at a bitrate of 192kbps. Whether it is encoded with standard DD or DD+ is irrelevant.

Last edited by GamerGuyX : 04-22-2008 at 09:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-23-2008, 11:23 AM
Josh Z's Avatar
HDD Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GamerGuyX View Post
Err... the HD DVD version of Bonnie & Clyde is still only presented in mono at a bitrate of 192kbps.
I stand corrected on the bit rate.
__________________
Joshua Zyber
Critic, High-Def Digest
Contributor, Home Theater Magazine
Curator, Laserdisc Forever | Cinema Zyberdiso.
My opinions are strictly my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of this site, its owners or employees.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-24-2008, 03:39 AM
theHDphantom's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Default

I have this one on the original DVD that was first released. Got it for like $5 a few years back. I don't think I'm gonna bother with this HD DVD version. This isn't a movie that I'd really come back to to watch again. I mean I only watched my DVD version of it once. Nice to hear the video quality was real good. Hopefully Twister gets a great A/V transfer as well.
__________________
How am I not myself?

Me ---> HD enthusiast, owner of a Jaguar X-Type, and a HUGE wrestling fan
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-03-2008, 12:29 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

This film is fantastic! The transfer is great and the Pic quality is AMAZING!!

I never saw this film until now, and now that I have seen it, wonder why I waited so long.

I also really like the book like case it comes in. Great read on the inside too.
Warner did a nice job with this one! Worth every penny spent on it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0