|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
In an upcoming marketing blitzkrieg, Sony will promote the console's cutting-edge high-def capabilities, including its extensive studio support, superior picture and sound, and web-enabled connectivity.
Full story: http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/615 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isnt this the exact same thing that sony did about a year ago.
Toot everything the system could do but play games. Maybe they should change their stratagy, because its not quite working. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well the way I see it is that Bluray is the only thing left for Sony to really push this console with, they are riding on the fact that Bluray is currently leading (although not leading much in the grand scheme of things) to push their console since actually pushing it as a console isnt working very well
Its in last place right now and is being outsold 2:1 by Nintendo's Wii and of course isnt even coming close to touching MS's numbers on the 360 personally I dont see this marketing blitz working very well, with HD media taking up like 2% of the market right now too many people arent going to care about Bluray and HD movies right now, they already arent caring enough as it is AND they arent really caring much about the PS3 in general, so lets just market the PS3 to the smallest amount of people who care now and thats the people who already support HD media formats, the general public isnt interested in the PS3 right now and throwing Bluray at them wont help them much IMO Their marketing blitz needs to throw out a price drop, thats really the only thing thats going to help Sony climb up faster out of the hole they are in And as I've said before the PS3 wont and cant win the HD format war for Bluray, it will be the wide adoption of one of the formats through stand alones and the general public finally switching over, but even that will be hard to do since about 100% of the market can play regular DVDs but probably 40% or so can do HD, HD needs to be almost 100% acceptance for one of these formats to "win" anything |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
To me, it seems like Sony is almost saying... 'We give up on the whole gaming thing... let's not talk about this as a console... it's a great Blu-ray player!'
They already tried this... and it's not working!
__________________
JU1CYFRU1T "The Velvet Hammer" Sony KDS-R60XBR2 SU-RS51U TV Stand Onkyo TX-NR905B AVR Panasonic DMP-BD30K Toshiba HD-A35 17" MacBook Pro SA 8300 HD DVR Xbox 360 Elite Nintendo Wii Harmony 880 I BITE (link) |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And how will this news impact this campaign? Apparently it's not capable of bit stream audio so it can't transport advanced codecs over HDMI.
__________________
My ISP speed: 57,901 kb/s DL This is how transparent Sony's strategies are: Aodh (12-22-2008, 03:21 AM): I personally think Sony is around breakeven ($400-500 cost) which could explain introducing a higher priced model to try to recoup some of the loss taken on the lower price one. PS3Fanboy.com (12-23-2008, 9:45AM): iSuppli, the company which broke down the PS3 at launch ... now, they say the PS3 costs 53% less to make -- at around $445 |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Actually the interest is there for the PS3, its just not many wallets can handle to entry cost. Likewise with neogeo - had the least games available, and cost the most. Didnt make it any less awsome for us spoiled kids. Games still get released it on it, go figure. Quote:
The Xbox has had like 20 months to reach 10 mil, sony has had one third of that time and has read a third of the higher end console market. Where are they going wrong? PS1 never walked off with the market, it was extremely slow and steady at the beginning. The big question should be now, will MS use this year lead to cut the 360 short in its life cycle, say maybe about 2008 - 2009, and release a new console? I dont see a true ps4 till 2010 earliest, but probably 2011 - 2012. Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Please Post Responsibly. If necessary, use a designated poster. Don't be a fanboi. *this message brought to you by the supporters of "I hate senseless bickering" corporation in association with the "smackdown forum anti-degredation act". |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now when we're talking about audio on players, we're talking about a different scenario. We're talking about the players decoding the audio (HD DVD standard, not for Blu-ray) and outputting PCM. Now all HD DVD players and PS3s, as well as some Blu-ray stand-alones I'm sure, all are forced to decode internally and output PCM. Ack is right in that this impacts everyone, I wouldn't call it as much a loss as a change in perception. What value will receivers have not to decode advanced codecs when for the most part they'll receive PCM due to player restrictions.
__________________
My ISP speed: 57,901 kb/s DL This is how transparent Sony's strategies are: Aodh (12-22-2008, 03:21 AM): I personally think Sony is around breakeven ($400-500 cost) which could explain introducing a higher priced model to try to recoup some of the loss taken on the lower price one. PS3Fanboy.com (12-23-2008, 9:45AM): iSuppli, the company which broke down the PS3 at launch ... now, they say the PS3 costs 53% less to make -- at around $445 |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Please Post Responsibly. If necessary, use a designated poster. Don't be a fanboi. *this message brought to you by the supporters of "I hate senseless bickering" corporation in association with the "smackdown forum anti-degredation act". |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think many understand that the PS3 is a wonderful machine... but many, like myself, will and will continue to balk at the price tag no matter what sort of fancy advertising they come up with.
There's a reason the PS2 is still selling so well... |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
My ISP speed: 57,901 kb/s DL This is how transparent Sony's strategies are: Aodh (12-22-2008, 03:21 AM): I personally think Sony is around breakeven ($400-500 cost) which could explain introducing a higher priced model to try to recoup some of the loss taken on the lower price one. PS3Fanboy.com (12-23-2008, 9:45AM): iSuppli, the company which broke down the PS3 at launch ... now, they say the PS3 costs 53% less to make -- at around $445 |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
It won't. It's still the best high-definition player available, or at the very least one of the best. An obscure feature that no player supports will have no bearing on a marketing campaign.
__________________
Receiver: Denon 3808CI / Remote: Logitech Harmony One Speakers: Monitor Audio RS6 front, RSLCR center, R90 back, Elemental Design sub Consoles: PS2 (slim), GC (digital), Xbox 360 Premium, PS3 (60GB), GBA SP, PSP Slim Set top boxes: Apple TV 160GB, Dish ViP722 HD DVR TV: Sony XBR2 46" 1080p LCD PS2 > 360 > PS3 > GameCube > Xbox > Wii (games) PS3 > 360 > Wii (overall) Blu-Ray > HD DVD |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
(And now the Toshiba's have it beat by matching the decoding capabilities as well as adding in the BD standards which aren't going to even be implemented till the end of the year.)
__________________
My ISP speed: 57,901 kb/s DL This is how transparent Sony's strategies are: Aodh (12-22-2008, 03:21 AM): I personally think Sony is around breakeven ($400-500 cost) which could explain introducing a higher priced model to try to recoup some of the loss taken on the lower price one. PS3Fanboy.com (12-23-2008, 9:45AM): iSuppli, the company which broke down the PS3 at launch ... now, they say the PS3 costs 53% less to make -- at around $445 |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's an unfair question used to detract from the issue. In the other thread you talk about how this is throwing it back in the face of people harping about the Elite not having 1.3 HDMI. That I can fully understand and appreciate. But when you start on this path, that's where you lose me. Your question is fully of unknowns that cannot be answered until they release the marketing plan.
__________________
Please Post Responsibly. If necessary, use a designated poster. Don't be a fanboi. *this message brought to you by the supporters of "I hate senseless bickering" corporation in association with the "smackdown forum anti-degredation act". |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also this coincides with the announcement of the Onkyo DTS-HD MA Receiver which was also announced today, and now we find out that the PS3 won't be able to output the DTS-HD MA stream to the reciever. This mainly affects the PS3 and Fox releases where they for the most part included DTS-HD MA tracks in place of PCM. As for the plan, we won't know how they talk about it, but now we'll have to be critical when they mention HDMI 1.3 or Advanced Codecs.
__________________
My ISP speed: 57,901 kb/s DL This is how transparent Sony's strategies are: Aodh (12-22-2008, 03:21 AM): I personally think Sony is around breakeven ($400-500 cost) which could explain introducing a higher priced model to try to recoup some of the loss taken on the lower price one. PS3Fanboy.com (12-23-2008, 9:45AM): iSuppli, the company which broke down the PS3 at launch ... now, they say the PS3 costs 53% less to make -- at around $445 |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM.




Toot everything the system could do but play games. Maybe they should change their stratagy, because its not quite working.

Linear Mode

