Go Back   High-Def Digest Forums > Smackdown Forums > Game Consoles Smackdown
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:32 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Default Stringer: PS3 [losses] probably won't be recovered; "as long as I live"

Quote:
Sony CEO, Sir Howard Stringer, has had a bit of a light-hearted chat with German news source Welt Online. He revealed that the $3 billion spent on developing the PS3 probably won't be recovered; well, "Not for as long as I live," he said. He had a good old chuckle about it though.

You've got to wonder at the wisdom of the amount of money spent on Sony's latest console endeavour, even though we're now pretty happy with the end result. I'm not sure Sir Howard is not playing a hand close to his chest here. Sure, that $3bn is NEVER going to earned from hardware sales of the PS3 - or at least not until it reaches PS2 levels of sales, which is now only a very distant prospect - but there's got to been a certain financial value on the high definition format war.

Sony has basically won that war, although Blu-ray hasn't yet succeeded in the same way as DVD. The PS3 was absolutely fundamental to that victory and the revenue that it will generate for Sony in the long term can only be guessed at.

Source
Quote:
Stringer: Wii business model superior to PS3’sTim Ingham Today, 5:28pm
Comments (2)

Console won’t recoup losses ‘in my lifetime’, admits Sony boss

Sony CEO Howard Stringer has admitted that PS3 hardware sales aren’t ever likely to recoup the $3.3 billion losses the machine has already occurred.

In a wider interview, Stringer also admitted that he had played on a Wii – and said that Sony had “neglected to pursue” Nintendo’s audience effectively in the past.

He added that Wii "may [have] a superior [business] model" – despite calling it an "expensive, niche game device" in the past.

“The major difference lies in the fact that Nintendo makes money with the hardware alone, which may be a superior business model,” he said.

“But the Wii is not succeeding at our expense – it is not hurting us. We decided years ago to build a game console that offers much greater functionality. The Playstation 3 has an enormous processor; it is gradually emerging as the central server in our users' homes.”

Source.
Interesting. Discuss.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:37 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Default

Straight from the horse's mouth. They won 1 out of 2 battles. The torch has been passed this gen it seems. That's what happens when you neglect your base and neglect online gaming.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Default

I think the wording is key. It's entirely possible that the PS3 hardware itself will never sell enough to make up for the investment. However, software and accessory sales, along with mildly profittable hardware, could ultimately erase the $3.3 billion loss. Obviously, we're looking long term, though.

With that being said, though, perhaps it's not as grey a question as I'd like it to be... Who knows, ya know?
__________________
32in Sanyo Vizon
: 10 (Now playing: Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, Warhawk, MotorStorm: Pacific Rift, Resistance 2)
: 2 (Now playing: Infinite Undiscovery)

PSN/XBL: Radant128 (When you add me, lemme know you're from HDD)

Next games: (360)Gears of War 2

DC fanboy!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Default

I have to thank Sony for sacrificing profits in order to deliver the best console in gaming history to date
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:41 PM
diggumsmax's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Default

This is what happens when you try to trojan horse your game console to win movie format war. Sure, it one the format war for them but at what cost to their gaming division? I'm really glad MS didn't wait a year to launch the 360 with HD DVD. They would have suffered the same fate (although it might have given them time to hammer out those pesky hardware issues).
__________________
Setup

360 gamertag = pooster

New Alan Wake Trailer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:41 PM
Stranger Danger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default

Didn't the original xbox not make a profit as well? So they lost money on it, does it make it less of a machine in that fashion?
__________________
PS3 60g OMG it plays blu-rays?
Blu-ray 37 | Hd-Dvd 0
Polaroid 40' 720p/1080i
Yamaha HTR-5460 Receiver
Tivoli Tower Fronts, Jensen center, sub and rears
Dish Network VIP 722 DVR 500gig
"Cry some more" Heavy, Team Fortress 2
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:42 PM
james's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington, DC/Northern VA
Buy/Sell/Trade Score: 10
Posts: 10,469
Default

Sorry to bring another conversation into this thread, but I am surprised you have not responded to this post or the subsequent posts:

http://forums.highdefdigest.com/1155178-post56.html

So by you not responding, I am forced to believe you do not disagree with his assertions. Please stop stating the 360 has ANA/HANA scaler if you know it to be untrue.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:43 PM
michealo's Avatar
Decider of Funny
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Default

can we discuss the pros and cons of selective quoting to smokescreen a rational meaning to an article?

"that $3bn is NEVER going to earned from hardware sales of the PS3"

yes, he mentions PS3 hardware sales specifically and even goes as far as to congratulate nintendo for making profits in this manner.

will software/accessory sales make up that $3bn? who knows.
__________________
why hate? participate!
Elitist Indifference FTW
xbox live = Wrangl3r / PSN = thummper
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:44 PM
Stranger Danger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diggumsmax View Post
This is what happens when you try to trojan horse your game console to win movie format war.
So by trojan horse you mean the people who bought it were hurt by it? I bought mine for games and blu-ray. Who was hurt by it? If Sony sent it in it won't be them. What the heck are you talking about?
__________________
PS3 60g OMG it plays blu-rays?
Blu-ray 37 | Hd-Dvd 0
Polaroid 40' 720p/1080i
Yamaha HTR-5460 Receiver
Tivoli Tower Fronts, Jensen center, sub and rears
Dish Network VIP 722 DVR 500gig
"Cry some more" Heavy, Team Fortress 2
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:44 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Default

Looks like I wasn't the only one who spotted that...
__________________
32in Sanyo Vizon
: 10 (Now playing: Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, Warhawk, MotorStorm: Pacific Rift, Resistance 2)
: 2 (Now playing: Infinite Undiscovery)

PSN/XBL: Radant128 (When you add me, lemme know you're from HDD)

Next games: (360)Gears of War 2

DC fanboy!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:44 PM
Badger3920's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Default

You never know. You guys like to throw around blu-ray a lot to somehow try and embarrass the console - and if you're going to stick to those guns, you have to accept that some of the blu-ray royalties are definitely due, in-part, to the ps3. That, plus software, plus video and psn downloads, plus advertising revenue, plus (as bbm said) mildly profitable hardware.... Who knows.

I won't make any assumptions. It's very interesting to be mid-gen and many people are trying to treat it as if it's already over. Very odd. To make an analogy, many races are won, lost, and defined in the second half. It's good to be fast out of the gate, but you have to finish. How many of you watched the racing in the olympics??
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:45 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goatmother View Post
I have to thank Sony for sacrificing profits in order to deliver the best console in gaming history to date
If you think they willingly did that for the benefit of the masses, then you are sadly mistaken.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michealo View Post
can we discuss the pros and cons of selective quoting to smokescreen a rational meaning to an article?

"that $3bn is NEVER going to earned from hardware sales of the PS3"

yes, he mentions PS3 hardware sales specifically and even goes as far as to congratulate nintendo for making profits in this manner.

will software/accessory sales make up that $3bn? who knows.
This. It's quite clear they plan for the loss to be made through software/etc. Just not from hardware sales.

And I think we all knew this (or should have known this, the facts were there) in 2006.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:46 PM
AnimalMother's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Default

So if the Xbox project is $6,500,000,000 in the hole, would Stringer have to live twice to see that recovered?
__________________
60GB | Elite 120GB | PC > PS3 > 360
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-28-2008, 03:46 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snarky View Post
If you think they willingly did that for the benefit of the masses, then you are sadly mistaken.
If you think that he thought that, then you are sadly mistaken.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0