-
03-29-2012 05:05 PM #1
Xbox 360 Main Use Today is Not for Gaming
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/xbox-liv...ews-14626.htmlBelieve it Not, Xbox 360 Main Use Today is Not for Gaming
According to the company, owners now spend more time watching TV and listening to music through the console than playing games with it. The average household now use the Xbox for 84 hours per month and the majority now goes to movies and videos, said Microsoft's Yusuf Mehdi. One year ago, passive entertainment content accounted for only 30 percent of Xbox usage.Intel i5 2500k (@4.7Ghz) + XFX Radeon 7970 3GB RAM! + 16GB DDR3 RAM (STEAM/Origin: Nealon_Greene)
Elitist >> mindless peon
Yamaha 6260 - 7.1 Polks - 2 LLT subs powered by 1000W
Optoma HD20 with 123" fixed screen for movies -
03-29-2012 05:16 PM #2
The set-top box idea MS envisioned for the 360 is a dead-end. With virtually all new flat-panel screens having built-in apps like HULU and Netflix, it's just a matter of time before the all-in-one box dies out. Gaming's the edge consoles have over things like Samsung BR players, SLING players, Apple TV and GoogleTV; even TVs themselves. It'll be a long while before we get all-in-one TV sets with gaming hardware built-in. So, until that day comes, consoles should support what sustains them, games.
MS unfortunately seems to think games are a gateway, not the actual reason. For now it's working, but I don't think they'll be as lucky with the next X-Box.Great quotes on the internet:
I hear Galaxy is brilliant, and it probably is. Just can't picture myself sitting down and playing it. That would take time away from watching the Disney Channel and working on my coloring book.Ryan Payton (MGS4 Associate Producer) -
03-29-2012 05:34 PM #3
-
03-29-2012 06:08 PM #4
Man I still remember the daily crowing we used to see on this board, for years:
"My x360 only plays games! That's what it's good at; your ps3 does all these other non-game things and doesn't have any games. Jack of all trades is master of none lol!!!!1"
Man oh man have the times changed.Currently Playing: Uncharted 3, Zelda: Skyward Sword
Back Burner: LBP2, LA Noire
Just finished: Anno 2070 (PC)
Home Theater: Panasonic PT-ae4000u, 110" Carada Brilliant White Screen, PS3
Gaming PC: Intel i5 2500k, 2gb GTX 670, 8GB DDR3 RAM, 256gb Samsung 840 Pro SSD, 64gb Patriot SSD -
03-29-2012 06:18 PM #5
-
03-29-2012 06:28 PM #6
-
03-29-2012 06:36 PM #7
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 895
With netflix / hulu / crackle/ mlbtc ect ect, it gives me less reason to turn off the console to do other activities. Therefore when Im done playing a game, I can still leave it on and catch tv. Its not that people are gaming less. I think the one major flaw everyone is missing was right in the article
"Of course, there is one potentially major flaw in the calculation as it is based on Xbox Live usage and cannot consider offline game play. "
being said, my gaming time has remained the same over the years, but my xbox and ps3 stay on a lot more due the apps available to them. The whole article should be common sense with the increase in available media to the systems.
It would be like saying cell phones are used less for talking now a days then they used to be, when in reality talk time remains the same, but games and facebook, tv, music ect ect probably make up the majority of what cell phones are used for today. -
03-29-2012 06:36 PM #8
I didn't say they hadn't, but the article isn't "Consoles main use today is not gaming". And yeah, we did, years ago, when TVs didn't have Netflix, HULU, VUDU, Skype, built-in browsers and podcast support, etc. Sony isn't pushing hard for it any more either, it's focusing on games, unlike MS which usually dedicates 30 minutes out of an E3 presser to sell people on ESPN.
Great quotes on the internet:
I hear Galaxy is brilliant, and it probably is. Just can't picture myself sitting down and playing it. That would take time away from watching the Disney Channel and working on my coloring book.Ryan Payton (MGS4 Associate Producer) -
03-29-2012 06:45 PM #9
-
03-29-2012 06:45 PM #10
-
03-29-2012 06:51 PM #11
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Posts
- 895
I understand sarcasm thank you. It was more pointed to the whole article in general which is a big no brainer. The fact that people will argue over this is dumb. You seem like a nice guy though.
Did you just break a rule?
(11) Do not IMPERSONATE other individuals or falsely represent yourself. You are only allowed one user name in our forums.
LOL. -
03-29-2012 06:59 PM #12
-
03-29-2012 08:24 PM #13
Don’t people realize PS3 streams with .8 Mbps more bitrate?
DarkRedRain (XBL, PSN, WiiU) -
03-29-2012 08:29 PM #14
-
03-29-2012 09:30 PM #15
It's called a parlor trick around here, noob.
I'm actually the opposite of you. I find console apps are clunky and slow compared to my roku and panny plasma apps. The only reason why i use netflix on the ps3 is because it does 5.1, otherwise I would just use the roku or the tv.
Getting back to one thing you said, yes, my talk time actually is significantly down on my smartphone because I can use one of several messaging services that are easier and quicker than most of my phone convos would be. Then again, I really only talk to about a grand total of 1 other person on my cell phone, unless its a client for work. It's much easier to shoot a quick google chat or text message than call each other 15 times a day
Bringing you all the best reviews of high definition entertainment.
Founded in April 2006, High-Def Digest is the ultimate guide for High-Def enthusiasts who demand only the best that money can buy. Updated daily and in real-time, we track all high-def disc news and release dates, and review the latest disc titles.
Copyright © 2012 Internet Brands, Inc. All rights reserved.



Reply With Quote

