Reply 
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Last>>
Results 1 to 15 of 40
  1. #1
    Favelle's Avatar
    Favelle is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Victoria, BC - Canada
    Posts
    14,193

    Default Xbox 360 Main Use Today is Not for Gaming


    Believe it Not, Xbox 360 Main Use Today is Not for Gaming
    http://www.tomsguide.com/us/xbox-liv...ews-14626.html

    According to the company, owners now spend more time watching TV and listening to music through the console than playing games with it. The average household now use the Xbox for 84 hours per month and the majority now goes to movies and videos, said Microsoft's Yusuf Mehdi. One year ago, passive entertainment content accounted for only 30 percent of Xbox usage.
    Intel i5 2500k (@4.7Ghz) + XFX Radeon 7970 3GB RAM! + 16GB DDR3 RAM (STEAM/Origin: Nealon_Greene)
    Elitist >> mindless peon
    Yamaha 6260 - 7.1 Polks - 2 LLT subs powered by 1000W
    Optoma HD20 with 123" fixed screen for movies
  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    11,006
    The set-top box idea MS envisioned for the 360 is a dead-end. With virtually all new flat-panel screens having built-in apps like HULU and Netflix, it's just a matter of time before the all-in-one box dies out. Gaming's the edge consoles have over things like Samsung BR players, SLING players, Apple TV and GoogleTV; even TVs themselves. It'll be a long while before we get all-in-one TV sets with gaming hardware built-in. So, until that day comes, consoles should support what sustains them, games.

    MS unfortunately seems to think games are a gateway, not the actual reason. For now it's working, but I don't think they'll be as lucky with the next X-Box.
    Great quotes on the internet:

    I hear Galaxy is brilliant, and it probably is. Just can't picture myself sitting down and playing it. That would take time away from watching the Disney Channel and working on my coloring book.
    Ryan Payton (MGS4 Associate Producer)
  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portland,Maine
    Posts
    9,600
    Quote Originally Posted by Indy_aka_Rex View Post
    The set-top box idea MS envisioned for the 360 is a dead-end. With virtually all new flat-panel screens having built-in apps like HULU and Netflix, it's just a matter of time before the all-in-one box dies out. Gaming's the edge consoles have over things like Samsung BR players, SLING players, Apple TV and GoogleTV; even TVs themselves. It'll be a long while before we get all-in-one TV sets with gaming hardware built-in. So, until that day comes, consoles should support what sustains them, games.

    MS unfortunately seems to think games are a gateway, not the actual reason. For now it's working, but I don't think they'll be as lucky with the next X-Box.
    Yeah, because Sony didn't trumpet the PS3 as an all in one either. Oh and you SDF didn't for YEARS talk about how the ps3 could do all in one either.
    Spoiler:
    Quote Originally Posted by michealo View Post
    the 360 has beaten the PS3 so far this gen and set the stage for winning next gen
    Quote Originally Posted by RedRedSuit View Post
    I pathetic Sony defending piece of shit dick-rider.
  4. #4
    Badger3920's Avatar
    Badger3920 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    17,957
    Quote Originally Posted by CorruptedDragon View Post
    Yeah, because Sony didn't trumpet the PS3 as an all in one either. Oh and you SDF didn't for YEARS talk about how the ps3 could do all in one either.
    Man I still remember the daily crowing we used to see on this board, for years:

    "My x360 only plays games! That's what it's good at; your ps3 does all these other non-game things and doesn't have any games. Jack of all trades is master of none lol!!!!1"

    Man oh man have the times changed.
    Currently Playing: Uncharted 3, Zelda: Skyward Sword
    Back Burner: LBP2, LA Noire
    Just finished: Anno 2070 (PC)
    Home Theater: Panasonic PT-ae4000u, 110" Carada Brilliant White Screen, PS3
    Gaming PC: Intel i5 2500k, 2gb GTX 670, 8GB DDR3 RAM, 256gb Samsung 840 Pro SSD, 64gb Patriot SSD
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portland,Maine
    Posts
    9,600
    Quote Originally Posted by Badger3920 View Post
    Man I still remember the daily crowing we used to see on this board, for years:

    "My x360 only plays games! That's what it's good at; your ps3 does all these other non-game things and doesn't have any games. Jack of all trades is master of none lol!!!!1"

    Man oh man have the times changed.
    True.
    I think some people like Indy are going to deny that even SDF said that the reason ps3 was so expensive and great was that it was an all in one.
    Although the PS3 still doesn't have any good games.
    Spoiler:
    Quote Originally Posted by michealo View Post
    the 360 has beaten the PS3 so far this gen and set the stage for winning next gen
    Quote Originally Posted by RedRedSuit View Post
    I pathetic Sony defending piece of shit dick-rider.
  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Occupying a job
    Posts
    9,275
    Quote Originally Posted by CorruptedDragon View Post
    Although the PS3 still doesn't have any good games.
    Apparently neither does the 360, otherwise it'd used for....gaming.

    PC rules?
  7. #7
    evolone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    895
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnalogKid View Post
    Apparently neither does the 360, otherwise it'd used for....gaming.

    PC rules?
    With netflix / hulu / crackle/ mlbtc ect ect, it gives me less reason to turn off the console to do other activities. Therefore when Im done playing a game, I can still leave it on and catch tv. Its not that people are gaming less. I think the one major flaw everyone is missing was right in the article

    "Of course, there is one potentially major flaw in the calculation as it is based on Xbox Live usage and cannot consider offline game play. "


    being said, my gaming time has remained the same over the years, but my xbox and ps3 stay on a lot more due the apps available to them. The whole article should be common sense with the increase in available media to the systems.

    It would be like saying cell phones are used less for talking now a days then they used to be, when in reality talk time remains the same, but games and facebook, tv, music ect ect probably make up the majority of what cell phones are used for today.
  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    11,006
    Quote Originally Posted by CorruptedDragon View Post
    Yeah, because Sony didn't trumpet the PS3 as an all in one either. Oh and you SDF didn't for YEARS talk about how the ps3 could do all in one either.
    I didn't say they hadn't, but the article isn't "Consoles main use today is not gaming". And yeah, we did, years ago, when TVs didn't have Netflix, HULU, VUDU, Skype, built-in browsers and podcast support, etc. Sony isn't pushing hard for it any more either, it's focusing on games, unlike MS which usually dedicates 30 minutes out of an E3 presser to sell people on ESPN.
    Great quotes on the internet:

    I hear Galaxy is brilliant, and it probably is. Just can't picture myself sitting down and playing it. That would take time away from watching the Disney Channel and working on my coloring book.
    Ryan Payton (MGS4 Associate Producer)
  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Occupying a job
    Posts
    9,275
    Quote Originally Posted by evolone View Post
    I thought you were being serious
    I understand, it happens.
  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portland,Maine
    Posts
    9,600
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnalogKid View Post

    PC rules?
    Yes. PC rocks.
    Spoiler:
    Quote Originally Posted by michealo View Post
    the 360 has beaten the PS3 so far this gen and set the stage for winning next gen
    Quote Originally Posted by RedRedSuit View Post
    I pathetic Sony defending piece of shit dick-rider.
  11. #11
    evolone is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    895
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnalogKid View Post
    I understand, it happens.
    I understand sarcasm thank you. It was more pointed to the whole article in general which is a big no brainer. The fact that people will argue over this is dumb. You seem like a nice guy though.

    Did you just break a rule?

    (11) Do not IMPERSONATE other individuals or falsely represent yourself. You are only allowed one user name in our forums.

    LOL.
  12. #12
    michealo's Avatar
    michealo is offline Decider of Funny
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    18,302
    and the majority of PC gaming occurs on Facebook, the casuals are sadly taking over.

    "It just plays games" just rolled over in the meme grave.
    why hate? participate!
    Elitist Indifference FTW
    xbox live = Wrangl3r / PSN = thummper / wiiU = mm / steam = michealo
  13. #13
    hdinred's Avatar
    hdinred is online now Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    8,307
    Don’t people realize PS3 streams with .8 Mbps more bitrate?
    DarkRedRain (XBL, PSN, WiiU)
  14. #14
    michealo's Avatar
    michealo is offline Decider of Funny
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    18,302
    Not me, streaming anything is crap quality.
    why hate? participate!
    Elitist Indifference FTW
    xbox live = Wrangl3r / PSN = thummper / wiiU = mm / steam = michealo
  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Occupying a job
    Posts
    9,275
    Quote Originally Posted by evolone View Post
    Did you just break a rule?
    It's called a parlor trick around here, noob.


    I'm actually the opposite of you. I find console apps are clunky and slow compared to my roku and panny plasma apps. The only reason why i use netflix on the ps3 is because it does 5.1, otherwise I would just use the roku or the tv.

    Getting back to one thing you said, yes, my talk time actually is significantly down on my smartphone because I can use one of several messaging services that are easier and quicker than most of my phone convos would be. Then again, I really only talk to about a grand total of 1 other person on my cell phone, unless its a client for work. It's much easier to shoot a quick google chat or text message than call each other 15 times a day
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Last>>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1