Go Back   High-Def Digest Forums > High-Definition Content and Gear > Film Forum
Reload this Page How they crafted Skinny Steve (Captain America's 90 lbs Body)
Reply 
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    4,597

    Default How they crafted Skinny Steve (Captain America's 90 lbs Body)


    You may know this since it was taken from yahoo and if you don't know it yet, here are the news:


    Brawny "Captain America" saved by "Skinny Steve"




    LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The story of Captain America is well covered in comic book lore: a scrawny, bullied orphan named Steve Rogers is chosen for a top secret government project during World War II in which he becomes a test subject for a super serum.

    The serum transforms him into a strong and able soldier named Captain America, and he leads the U.S. Army in its fight against the Nazis.
    Actor Chris Evans, who plays the title character in Friday's release of "Captain America: The First Avenger," put on 15 lbs. of muscle to play the role.
    The problem: he got too big for Steve Rodgers. Solution: "Skinny Steve."
    Having literally built Evans into what the film's director Joe Johnston called "the perfect human specimen," the movie makers had to figure out how the 6 ft. tall actor with the muscled-up physique could convincingly portray the pre-serum Steve Rogers, a scrawny kid of a mere 90-something lbs.

    Hollywood has dealt with on screen body changes in many ways over the years. The cast and crew of the 2000 film "Cast Away" took a year-long break so its star, Tom Hanks -- who first gained 50 lbs. for the role -- could drop weight to look like he'd been stranded on a tropical island for years.

    One option for "Captain America" was to superimpose Evans' head on a skinny body double, much like the technology employed by filmmaker David Fincher in "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" when Brad Pitt had to age backward.
    Last year Fincher employed the same technique in "The Social Network," in which Armie Hammer played Tyler Winklevoss and identical twin brother Cameron Winklevoss, which meant digitally putting Hammer's head on actor Josh Pence's body.

    'SKINNY STEVE' TO THE RESCUE:

    On "Captain America," there was no way to take a year off because its backers at Marvel Studios have been on a tight schedule rolling out their superheroes one by one -- including the recent "Thor" -- so audiences will be familiar with most of them when they join forces in next summer's "The Avengers."

    Like Fincher in "Social Network," director Johnston initially hired a body double and used the head replacement system in a scene where Steve Rogers was lying on a table. But he quickly realized it wouldn't work for other sequences.

    "Chris moves in such a unique way; he doesn't move like anybody else," Johnston told Reuters. "The body double could not move like him. As hard as he tried to watch Chris and duplicate the movements, it just wasn't the same."

    That was perfectly fine with Evans, who was not keen on having another actor involved in creating the iconic role.

    "The beginning part of the movie is so crucial to get the audience invested in who Steve is, I didn't want to share that part of the performance with another actor," Evans, 30, told Reuters. "I talked to Joe about it and thankfully, he agreed."

    Instead of the body double/superimposed head, the filmmakers used a "shrinking" technique and computers to basically erase portions of Evans' strong physique on screen.

    "We filmed over 250 shots of Chris and used digital technology to 'shrink' him down to what we called 'Skinny Steve,'" said Johnston.

    "It's pretty amazing," added Evans. "They took shape out of my jaw line, they shrunk my skeleton and they made my shoulders less broad."

    While it may sound easy, it wasn't. Each time Evans' body went through the digital nips and tucks, it created empty space in the background which needed to be filled in.
    Multiple shots had to be filmed with green screens just to superimpose the scenery that would normally have been there had bulky Evans really been little, scrappy Steve Rogers.
    "It was a very arduous process," said Johnston. "It took all of pre-production and most of production to do all 250 shots."




    Why...... So......Serious?
  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    4,597
    I always saw something weird, ala Benjamin Button but this is crazy. Still kuddos to the pre-production/post production team.
    Why...... So......Serious?
  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    1,801
    probably would have saved them 5 million to just hire a skinny Steve. sometimes technology is an albatross around Hollywoods neck.
    I hate every ape I see, from chimpan-A to chimpanzee. No, you'll never make a monkey out of me!
  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    6,708
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Teeth View Post
    probably would have saved them 5 million to just hire a skinny Steve. sometimes technology is an albatross around Hollywoods neck.
    They said they tried that, and it didn't look right.
    AOS Pyrochaos
    Pyrochaos
    Quote Originally Posted by WellInformed View Post
    Yes, X360 has technical advantages over the PS3. Bad code can still run on the X360. It can't run on the PS3.
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    1,801
    thats crap, they just wanted to show off the power of computers. it cant look any more off than "skinny Steve"
    I hate every ape I see, from chimpan-A to chimpanzee. No, you'll never make a monkey out of me!
  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,924
    Skinny steve may only look off cause we actually know what chris evans is supposed to look like.
  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    4,597
    I am pro technology. I think that if they can accomplish something good, why not give it a try. I think Benjamin B. was a very decent art work but if they can get the same result using the shrink tech I rather use the same actor than a fake body. I think it's a matter of taste. I do agree that CGI still have long way to go, we'll get there.
    Why...... So......Serious?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts