Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    timcharger is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,916

    Default Perplexing Scoring Logic of HDD's Reviews

    Quote Originally Posted by timcharger View Post
    I have multi-dipped on Rowling's franchises. Wondering
    if I'll do the same for the 3D of Fantastic Beasts. Hope
    to see that review.
    Quote Originally Posted by Palmer View Post
    Bryan has finally reviewed the Blu-ray 3D, but unfortunately this one's For 3D Fans Only:

    http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/4164...indthem3d.html
    Thanks for the 3D review.

    -----

    The wide interpretation and application of the scoring
    logic in HDD's reviews often perplex me.

    I completely agree with the Audio scoring logic used
    in the review. The standard blu-ray release has
    Atmos and Bryan loved it, so that got 5 Stars. The
    3D disc doesn't include Atmos, only 5.1 DTS MA,
    and Bryan hears the inferiority, so it got 4 Stars.

    (There is no averaging of scores despite the
    package includes both discs. At least, there is no
    mention of averaging to reach the 4 Stars score.)

    For the Video scoring of the 3D disc, the scoring
    logic ignores that Bryan loved the standard blu-ray's
    Video with 5 Stars. And if the 3D version doesn't
    lose the detail, if the image isn't darker, and Bryan
    notes that the colors pop just as much; so that
    would suggest little to no loss in scoring. Further,
    the 3D adds depth and fun, as Bryan commented,
    so that would suggest additional points. But the
    final tally is a lower 4.5 Stars for the 3D versus 5
    Stars for the 2D?

    (Admittedly 4.5 Stars versus 5 Stars is close.)

    Lastly, the Bottom Line irks me. 2D is "HIGHLY
    RECOMMENDED." And 3D is "FOR FANS ONLY." In
    the scale of Bottom Lines, they are on opposite
    spectrums. "A" student versus "D, F" student. I
    even recall reviewers qualify their Bottom Line,
    with language like this:
    For fans of 3D, this is highly recommended, so
    that's the Bottom Line: Highly Recommended.

    But the review uses the negative Bottom Line
    rating to essentially posit this:
    For fans of excellent 3D, this is highly
    recommended, so that's the Bottom Line: For
    Fans Only. (Huh?!)

    What's the point for this distinction in a 3D
    review? Who would be considering a purchase of
    of the 3D version, who ISN'T a fan of 3D? This
    would be like writing a review for a Chinese
    restaurant, and qualifying the strong, positive
    recommendation only for fans of Chinese food.
    Last edited by timcharger; 04-19-2017 at 03:18 AM.

  2. #2
    timcharger is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,916

    Default

    Even this sentence:
    Quote Originally Posted by Palmer View Post
    Bryan has finally reviewed the Blu-ray 3D, but unfortunately this one's For 3D Fans Only:

    http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/4164...indthem3d.html
    According to the review (acknowledging the
    omission of Atmos), it's an excellent 3D
    presentation. Actually reading the review, it's
    FORTUNATE for 3D fans. But the use of the
    Bottom Line with a negative connotation,
    results in it having an "unfortunate"
    description.

    Maybe I'm nitpicking on words and scoring
    tallies. But it just seems there's an
    undercurrent of negativity. Even when the
    3D presentation is excellently done, it must
    be stressed, it's ONLY excellent for a
    subgroup of people.

    Would a UHD review emphasize an
    excellent recommendation but ONLY for fans
    of 2160p?

  3. #3
    Krawk's Avatar
    Krawk is online now Super-Duper Mod
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    10,961

    Default

    I personally question the UHD scores. When this site started reviewing UHD movies they indicated there would be a higher expectation. With that being said how does a 2K DI release get a 5-star video rating? The HDR aspect is only part of the UHD score, resolution should still amount for at least half a point, if not a full point.
    Keep Physical Media Alive, Just say NO to digital "ownership"

  4. #4
    Palmer is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,153

    Default

    Thank you for your suggestions. Fantastic Beasts 3D's Final Thoughts and Bottom Line should be clearer now. Also, the movie's 3D video score is not relative to its 2D counterpart, but rather to other 3D titles.

    Lastly, UHD scores are based solely on the final product, not on a specification listed on IMDB. Our article about When 4K is Not 4K is extremely informative, but I wonder if it also creates an unnecessary bias at times. It's not an exact analogy, but some folks used to say 3D conversions couldn't compete with native 3D productions and, while there are certainly many bad 3D conversions, there is ample proof that 1) 3D conversions can be as effective or better than native productions and 2) there is a lot more to the process that we don't see -- ie, even native productions use some conversion. UHD is the same thing -- there have been mediocre upconversions and there will be ones that stand up against or best native 4K. For example, upconverting a CGI animated movie is probably going to look vastly better in UHD than a 4K scan of something like THE GHOSTBUSTERS.

    Cheers.

  5. #5
    Krawk's Avatar
    Krawk is online now Super-Duper Mod
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    10,961

    Default

    Well, we've determined that a 5.0 score for streaming might equate to a 3.5 for a blu ray. It's the format's potential and if the product is not fully utilized it is not a perfect score. I'm not going to rehash this argument again. A movie might be as good as it can possibly look and perhaps that is some of the weight involved but we have seen Blu Ray scores lowered because the source material is not the best. I see a parallel here.
    Keep Physical Media Alive, Just say NO to digital "ownership"

  6. #6
    timcharger is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,916

    Default

    Thanks HDD. Appreciate the followup and amendments.

  7. #7
    Krawk's Avatar
    Krawk is online now Super-Duper Mod
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    10,961

    Default

    Slither gets a 3.5 star overall score and is worth a look but yet Beyond the Gates gets 3.0 stars and is recommended.

    Even the actual break down scores for movie itself, audio and video for Slither are higher.
    Keep Physical Media Alive, Just say NO to digital "ownership"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1