|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There goes the much flaunted (by BD fanatics) "space advantage". |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is about as close to production as the 200gb blu-ray disks that sony reported
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
No. That's what your HOPING. Truth often differs from fantasy.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is one-up on the Dual-Layer Blu-ray discs last year that just didn't work that were playing on hard drives pretending to work. o.ob
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Too bad modern Blu Ray players probably won't be able to read them. What an advantage...unusable discs!
__________________
"The war is not over" Universal, now Paramount...FOX anyone?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
You guys realize that 30 GB is more then sufficient for most HD content. 50 GB better still more then you need. 200 GB, whoa that is a lot of space.
__________________
HD Video & Sound is not the future it is NOW, spread the word! My Setup: Click Here “The Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.”-Carl Sagan |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lol, it's so ridiculous. We got 50GB with tripple layer technology! We r0x0r! When Blu-ray had it with 2 layers a year before.
What do people think would be cheaper to produce, 2 or 3 layers?
__________________
got Blu? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You sound a little bitter at the news, btw. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Why would I be bitter? It's ridiculous. It's like team A broke the land speed record in 2006, and team B boasts that they can match team A's record in 2007 or later only with a less efficient vehicle. What is that to boast about?
__________________
got Blu? Last edited by HarakoMeshi : 01-08-2007 at 01:31 AM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whether the space is needed or not, if it comes out, then they will have matched current BD capacity and that helps PR if nothing else. Toshiba is making every right move you can make. I rate them a buy.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was talking about movies that actually use a BD50.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is probably true, however, most likely any player that is able to read a a 200GB BD disc will be backwards compatible with any current BD discs.
__________________
HD Video & Sound is not the future it is NOW, spread the word! My Setup: Click Here “The Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.”-Carl Sagan Last edited by firelizard : 01-08-2007 at 01:36 AM. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
There will never be HDDVD50 movies since it was not in the standard from beginning like BD50 was.
Whatever new media comes out, HDVD50, BD75, 100, 200 whatever will likely be for data only. Something possible though could be to use 2 layers as a normal disc and extra layers only accessible by future players.
__________________
got Blu? Last edited by HarakoMeshi : 01-08-2007 at 01:35 AM. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wanna bet?
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 AM.





Linear Mode

