Reply 
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last>>
Results 1 to 15 of 20
  1. #1
    Attebery's Avatar
    Attebery is offline Editor-in-Chief
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    6,180

    Default 'Wedding Crashers' - High-Def Digest Review


    Nate has reviewed 'Wedding Crashers.' He says this comedy has lots of great replay value. This Blu-ray doesn't offer the best video and audio, but it does come with plenty of extras. This is worth a look based on the film alone.

    Full review here:
    http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/1885...gcrashers.html
  2. #2
    ZebraMajor is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,001
    I'll point out Xylon's comparison thread over at AVS where he shows the two versions of the movie (theatrical vs. extended) use entirely separate encodes:

    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1107878

    Theatrical ends up having more grain and the extended appears more DNR-ed. Odd to say the least that they used two different encodes instead of seamless branching.
  3. #3
    Emoney7's Avatar
    Emoney7 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    GJ, Colorado
    Posts
    1,068
    One of my fav comedies... glad I didnt double dip on this when it came out and still looks like no reason to go blu on this one...

    Thanks for the good review..... finally.
    Main Setup: Mitsubishi 63" DLP/Panny BD30/HD-A35/Onkyo 705/ Sony 7.1 speaker setup.
    My Blu's: 127 My Red's: 66 Check out my Collection and Top Movie Lists Here! http://filmcrave.com/profile_home.php?id=3310
  4. #4
    twonunpackmule's Avatar
    twonunpackmule is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    2-D Theater
    Posts
    23,891
    It'll be $10 one of these days.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bane View Post
    I like how within 16 hours of owning a Wii U, you've had two comments deleted by Nintendo.
  5. #5
    Mark Booth's Avatar
    Mark Booth is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,642
    Yep... I'll definitely add this to my collection. But not until I can get it for less than $15. Might even wait for it to be $9.99 at Frys!

    Dear Studios: I have money to spend. But I'm being more frugal with it in my retirement. You want some of it?.... You gotta lower those street prices! $20 for a catalog title on Blu is ridiculous!

    Mark
  6. #6
    AmishFury's Avatar
    AmishFury is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    791
    Quote Originally Posted by ZebraMajor View Post
    I'll point out Xylon's comparison thread over at AVS where he shows the two versions of the movie (theatrical vs. extended) use entirely separate encodes:

    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1107878

    Theatrical ends up having more grain and the extended appears more DNR-ed. Odd to say the least that they used two different encodes instead of seamless branching.
    it's less odd they they used separate encodes more odd that one version was DNRed while the other was not

    it hurts my brain when i try to figure it out
    LONG LIVE DREAMCAST!
    TV: Sony KV40XBR800, Players: PS3 40GB, Toshiba HD-A20, Xbox 360 Audio: Marantz SR4002, Polk PSW10, speakers from old HTIB
    114 (0 on order)
    127 (1 on order)
    DVD: 350 (0 on order)
  7. #7
    Rhoq is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    121
    Finally got around to watching this the other day and I think it's the worst looking Blu-ray I own. It's bad. I actually watched the theatrical version since I find the unrated to drag a bit and it was riddled with DNR and noise.
  8. #8
    ZebraMajor is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,001
    Quote Originally Posted by AmishFury View Post
    it's less odd they they used separate encodes more odd that one version was DNRed while the other was not

    it hurts my brain when i try to figure it out
    I meant to say: Why bother spending money doing two separate encodes (and spend the money to DNR them differently) instead of spending presumably less money to reuse a single encode that utilizes seamless branching?

    I didn't word it correctly.
  9. #9
    Lakersvh's Avatar
    Lakersvh is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    468
    I wanted to buy this on Blu but the 3 star PQ made me not want it. I will keep my DVD
  10. #10
    project-blu is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Coventry
    Posts
    21,438
    Quote Originally Posted by Emoney7 View Post
    One of my fav comedies... glad I didnt double dip on this when it came out and still looks like no reason to go blu on this one...

    Thanks for the good review..... finally.
    no problemo, chief. i love the film, too. some titles get lost in the shuffle with all the other things going on. it's tough to fill in all the gaps AND continue moving forward, but we're trying. if it makes ya'll feel any better, my next review will be the first review for a blu-ray of the import nature (), and i have a few other titles in the works that no other site has.
    Nate Boss
    Visit Project-Blu
    Check out my new Tumblr profile!
    Hoping to get a new cult for Christmas. Already tired of playing with the last one.
  11. #11
    Hastor's Avatar
    Hastor is offline Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    516
    That sucks that it doesn't default to the best audio. Most consumers just hit play and assume its going to look/sound the best. I always double check, though as my stats show I can't use the newer codecs, but my player (PS3) always defaults to the one I can support even if the lossless is the default. However if something defaults to a lesser codec than I can support, it goes with the default. (If it defaults to DD stereo instead of DD 5.1 for example)
    Blu-Ray: PS3/Panasonic DMP-BDT220
    HD-DVD: Xbox360 HD-DVD Drive
    HD Gaming: PS3, Xbox360, Wii U, PC, PS Vita
    TV: Panasonic VIERA TC-P55VT50
    Audio: Onkyo TX-NR717
  12. #12
    daybona is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    212
    Its a shame this movie didnt get a better transfer as its definitely one of my favorite comedies.

    I also agree that 20$ is silly for a catalogue title. However, I dont own it on dvd so i'll probably snag it once it drops to 15.
  13. #13
    ben1080p's Avatar
    ben1080p is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    11,436
    One of my fav comedies hands down. Can watch this over and over.
    I own the BD and its def soft and I hope someone does a crazy good double dip soon with an actual HD picture.
    Format Neutral
    BD:78 HD:85

    Arch-Nemesis: ben1080i

    Quote Originally Posted by dannyschmanny View Post
    epic ben1080p.......f***ing ....epic.
    Yea..im that awesome.
  14. #14
    BostonMA's Avatar
    BostonMA is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    8,926
    Quote Originally Posted by ben1080p View Post
    One of my fav comedies hands down. Can watch this over and over.
    I own the BD and its def soft and I hope someone does a crazy good double dip soon with an actual HD picture.
    i think it's my favorite comedy but i held on too my dvd that i got way back when
  15. #15
    Lioncourt is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    138
    I don't know why Warner continues to do the lossy soundtrack as the default. If you don't have the proper receiver, a lossless track will automatically downgrade to the lossy one anyways so thanks but no thanks, Warner.
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last>>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1