Go Back   High-Def Digest Forums > Blu-ray Format-Specific Forums > Blu-ray Software General Discussion
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2009, 12:39 AM
dbacksfan's Avatar
HDD Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southwest USA
Default 'Star Trek V: The Final Frontier' - High-Def Digest Review

In order to do them all justice, High-Def Digest is reviewing each film in the 'Star Trek: Original Motion Picture Collection' individually. We'll get into the nitty gritty of each movie as we cover each title, but overall, the complete set is an easy recommendation.

Josh can see light at the end of the tunnel. He's turned his attention to the penultimate 'Star Trek' feature, 'Star Trek V: The Final Frontier.' He says this installment is without a doubt the weakest in the series, but still possesses plenty of positive elements. Video is problematic, audio is above average, and there are scads of supplements to keep hardcore fans engaged.

Full review here:
http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/2468...lfrontier.html
__________________
David Krauss,
HDD Reviewer/Contributor
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2009, 12:50 AM
Z0d's Avatar
Z0d Z0d is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default

I actually kind of like this movie. It's a mess story wise, and the effects are noticably worst, but I still find it enjoyable, mostly because of the emphasized character interactions in it. I certainly like it better than TMP, and most of the TNG movies.

Lol, I will say they have aged rather noticably by this movie, considering, timeline-wise, this is only a few months after Wrath of Khan
__________________
Consoles: PS3, X-box 360, Wii, Nintendo 64, Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo Entertainment System, Sega Dreamcast, Sega Saturn, Sega Genesis, Sega Master System, TurboDuo, Atari Flashback
-250+
-100-
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2009, 01:11 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default The Enterprise NCC-1701-A wasn't new.

Alright, time to geek out:

From the review: "This new Enterprise-A was apparently built overnight, and still has some kinks to be worked out."

Actually, according to Mr. Scott's guide to the Enterprise, the Enterprise-A was the re-christened Enterprise class USS Ti-Ho NCC-1798.

/nerd
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2009, 01:36 AM
Centauri's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Green Sector
Default

There is no Enterprise class. It's Constitution.
__________________
"Blu-ray: You can't rush basic operability..."

HD DVD: 2x Toshiba HD-A1
HD DVDs: 146, DVDs: 45


))) (((

"Watching Transformers is like putting a vacuum cleaner hose to your ear while looking through a kaleidoscope." -Me
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2009, 01:41 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Centauri View Post
There is no Enterprise class. It's Constitution.
And today's nerdiness award goes to... Centauri!!! Congrats!

Next award goes to the first person that's ever played the Star Fleet Battles board game.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2009, 01:52 AM
YellowFlash678's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brighton, MI
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Centauri View Post
There is no Enterprise class. It's Constitution.
that's awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2009, 02:02 AM
EpsilonX's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philnerd View Post
And today's nerdiness award goes to... Centauri!!! Congrats!

Next award goes to the first person that's ever played the Star Fleet Battles board game.
i saw some people playing it at college. does that count?
__________________
+ PS ftw.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2009, 02:59 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default Some discrepancies

Quote:
Originally Posted by Centauri View Post
There is no Enterprise class. It's Constitution.
memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Enterprise_class

Yeah, there were some discrepancies, and some references are made to "Enterprise class", but you're correct, it's generally agreed that it's Constitution class.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2009, 03:28 AM
Skwege's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default

Well I just figured its safe to assume that Starfleet had a few Constitution Class cruisers under construction and just decided to slap the name Enterprise on one of the newly constructed ones.

Nevertheless I still like this movie. As bad as it is there are some real good character moments, with great Kirk/Spock/McCoy banter. That's sort of what makes this movie frustrating is that its not all bad, it has some real good parts to it that as Josh said, deserves to be in a better movie.

Be interesting to see if the new movies revisit the scene when McCoy pulls the plug on his dad.
__________________
Proud to be purple.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-09-2009, 05:55 AM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Default

It was mentioned in another Star Trek review thread (believe it was IV) that the Enterprise that 'magically was made overnight' was in fact another ship that was simply 'rechristened' Enterprise because of what happened to the original ship in III. This has been written in official cannon books, but is not acknowledged by Josh for whatever reason.
__________________
Optoma HD700x 720p DLP Projector
Sony 5.1 Surround System (6 years old but works)
(Street Fighter IV)

Wii( Tiger Woods 2010 w/ Motion-plus)
(Star Trek TOS Season 1, Star Trek Motion Picture Trilogy, Bourne Supremacy,Xmen Trilogy, The Mummy)

Latest purchases in parenthesis
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-09-2009, 08:30 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EpsilonX View Post
i saw some people playing it at college. does that count?
The reference is so obscure, merely remembering its existence qualifies you. Gratz EpsilonX, you are today's nerd!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-09-2009, 09:54 AM
crazzeto's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Buy/Sell/Trade Score: 1
Posts: 14,834
Default

Finally, I thought Josh was getting sick of star trek! I know most people hate on this one, but I honestly find it somewhat enjoyable, not the best Trek film though.

Edit
BTW, FINALLY have my trek waiting for me at the appt building.

Meh... Ok Josh the explanation for the NCC-1701-A has already been given and it's plausable... Just move on man, just move on
__________________
Toshiba 50" 50HM67 SlimDLP (720P) w/Tivo HD, Harmony 720
HDM Players: Toshiba HD-A30, Samsung BD-P2500 (wow! reon!)
Onkyo TX-605SR, F Polk Monitor 50s bi-amped, C CS1, Yamaha sur & sub
X-Box 360, Wii, DreamCast, DS
67 HD DVD, 104 bluray (last purchase: Big Trouble Little China/300 Complete Edition)
Wii: 0774-4826-1902, Disney: Guest13971, WB: crazzeto Uni: Locutus4657 Sony: crazzeto

view pictures of my home theater and movies

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-09-2009, 10:55 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EpsilonX View Post
i saw some people playing it at college. does that count?
seems like you were at all the cool parties
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-09-2009, 11:06 AM
crazzeto's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Buy/Sell/Trade Score: 1
Posts: 14,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philnerd View Post
And today's nerdiness award goes to... Centauri!!! Congrats!

Next award goes to the first person that's ever played the Star Fleet Battles board game.
That gives you a nerd badge?? Dude everyone but josh knows that!
__________________
Toshiba 50" 50HM67 SlimDLP (720P) w/Tivo HD, Harmony 720
HDM Players: Toshiba HD-A30, Samsung BD-P2500 (wow! reon!)
Onkyo TX-605SR, F Polk Monitor 50s bi-amped, C CS1, Yamaha sur & sub
X-Box 360, Wii, DreamCast, DS
67 HD DVD, 104 bluray (last purchase: Big Trouble Little China/300 Complete Edition)
Wii: 0774-4826-1902, Disney: Guest13971, WB: crazzeto Uni: Locutus4657 Sony: crazzeto

view pictures of my home theater and movies

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-09-2009, 11:21 AM
Josh Z's Avatar
HDD Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonyeuw View Post
It was mentioned in another Star Trek review thread (believe it was IV) that the Enterprise that 'magically was made overnight' was in fact another ship that was simply 'rechristened' Enterprise because of what happened to the original ship in III. This has been written in official cannon books, but is not acknowledged by Josh for whatever reason.
You're not familiar with the concept of sarcasm, are you?
__________________
Joshua Zyber
Critic, High-Def Digest
Contributor, Home Theater Magazine
Curator, Laserdisc Forever | Cinema Zyberdiso.
My opinions are strictly my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of this site, its owners or employees.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0