|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Psst... if you're into talking dog movies, has Peter Bracke got a film for you! That's right, we're talkin' 'Beverly Hills Chihuahua!' The movie is about talking chihuahuas, what more must we tell you? This Blu-ray has good video and audio and plenty of extras. If you still bemoan the loss of the Taco Bell Chihuahua (who'd have thought sales would actually have been LOWER with that little fell on TV?), then give this puppy a rent.
Full review here: http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/1978...chihuahua.html |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter should be fired. Too many stars for this and not enough for others. His reviews are a joke and he obviously isn't qualified enough for this position. He's the laughing stock of this website.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh at first I thought it was Beverly Hills Copt, but that probably won't come until tpart four is released.
I don't know much about this movie. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
It actually has uncompressed PCM, not DTS-HD Master audio.
__________________
www.blu-news.com RELAUNCHED and BETTER than EVER. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
You are all too rough on Peter. His reviews are pretty straight forward and honest. He could have been a snob about it but instead he saw it as it was. Obviously many others did too, because this made a ton a money at theatres and probably will on home entertainment. I will always be grateful to Peter on many of his criticisms that you all bash him for, he has been on-target so much of the time.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know who you were referring to, but I wasn't bashing Peter. Just simply stating the audio mistake, and I'm glad he was honest with his scores when he could have given it .5 stars because people assume a film is bad.
__________________
www.blu-news.com RELAUNCHED and BETTER than EVER. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Was not referring to you Blu-News.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
He has not "been on-target so much of the time" either... |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
So you feel on the actual Blu-ray review (film review excluded) he has not been on target? Or just mostly his film reviews? I'm not bashing you, just curious.
__________________
www.blu-news.com RELAUNCHED and BETTER than EVER. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
His film reviews usually. He's a known disgrace in that area. A Time To Kill is one of his more recent examples.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why are they so bad? I don't get it, he's reviewing the film how he thought it was? Do you want him to have the same taste, or what? I don't get it.....
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I also don't believe these types of sites should be dealing with reviewing films anyway. They should stick to reviewing audio and video only...that is all they are good for. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
....another movie better than Reservoir DOGS?
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.






Linear Mode

