Go Back   High-Def Digest Forums > Blu-ray Format-Specific Forums > Blu-ray Software General Discussion
Register Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:14 PM
Attebery's Avatar
Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Default 'End Of Days' - High-Def Digest Review

Peter's review of 'End of Days' is up. He says the film is enjoyable camp. This Blu-ray has audio and video comparable to its HD DVD counterpart, but drops the supplements in the transition, leaving only a single commentary ported over from previous releases. For fans.

Full review here:
http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/endofdays.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:24 PM
gamma626's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default

I'll get the pack then instead of just this. thanks for the review!
__________________
PSN: Gammagoll
GT: Gammagoll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onslaught X View Post
You have just been blessed with the power of awesomeness.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:26 PM
Super-VHS's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default The errors! Oh the errors!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Bracke
Universal has repackaged the previous 1080p/VC-1 encode found on the HD DVD here, only re-encoded it in 1080p/AVC MPEG-4 (with a slightly expanded bitrate, thanks to the use of a BD-50 dual-layer disc).
Yeah, a few problems...

First, again with the codec - is it really AVC? EDIT: It appears I was wrong and Universal did indeed use the AVC codec for video (as per Blu-News.) Cause (again, as I mentioned in the Miami Vice thread where the exact same mistake was made) Universal stated that VC-1/DTS-HD MA were there codecs of choice. If they did indeed change codecs from their norm it's surprising but maybe it's the case (I don't know, I haven't actually watched this)... though I think it's more the case that the review is incorrect (again.)

Second, the BD-50 mention..... wrong. Both U-571 and this (End of Days) are mentioned here (at HDD by said reviewer) to be on BD-50s... this is incorrect. Both of these releases were pushed onto single-layer BD-25s. This would be why the video extras "mysteriously disappeared" on End of Days.

Last edited by Super-VHS : 08-14-2008 at 04:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2008, 01:49 PM
HectorB's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Default

pass on this as well! i think U-571 might be really worth upgrading if the audio is that much better than the hd-dvd.
__________________
Toshiba A35, Toshiba A30 HD-DVD players
PS3 60GB (Main Blu-ray player)
Xbox 360 Elite 120GB
Mitsubishi HC5500 - 1080p projector
Onkyo 705 Receiver
HSU sub VTF 2 - MK3
count: 250+ count: 250+
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2008, 02:32 PM
Founding Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vienna, Austria
Default

I will get this one. The movie is ridiculous, that's for sure, but it has something to it. The mother-daughter-satan threesome was kind of nice to watch and quite an original idea...
__________________
Konrad

My Blu-ray/DVD Collection

Discs: 451 , 1000+ DVDs
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:53 PM
Blu-News.com's Avatar
Always SpartanJohnson
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Post review on my blog:

Blu-news.com review
__________________
www.blu-news.com RELAUNCHED and BETTER than EVER.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2008, 03:56 PM
Super-VHS's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default

^^^^ VC-1 encoding confirmed???
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2008, 04:01 PM
Blu-News.com's Avatar
Always SpartanJohnson
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super-VHS View Post
^^^^ VC-1 encoding confirmed???
Nope, that was my mistake. Need to fix it. It's AVC
__________________
www.blu-news.com RELAUNCHED and BETTER than EVER.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2008, 04:03 PM
Super-VHS's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default

Really? BD-25 confirmed? (I've read multiple sources confirming but this AVC 'surprise' makes me wonder.)

Last edited by Super-VHS : 08-14-2008 at 04:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-14-2008, 04:04 PM
Blu-News.com's Avatar
Always SpartanJohnson
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super-VHS View Post
Really? BD-25 confirmed (I've read multiple sources confirming but this AVC 'surprise' makes me wonder.)
The case states it's a BD-25, as does the press releases included with them. I don't know how I would check other wise? And yeah, it's AVC, just popped it in and checked, don't know how that passed me.

EDIT: Also, if it was on a BD-50, it would have not dropped the extras most likely.
__________________
www.blu-news.com RELAUNCHED and BETTER than EVER.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-14-2008, 04:14 PM
Super-VHS's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-News.com View Post
The case states it's a BD-25, as does the press releases included with them. I don't know how I would check other wise? And yeah, it's AVC, just popped it in and checked, don't know how that passed me.
BD 25s have one barcode 'ring' on the bottom (or back)... BD50s have two.

It's strange that Universal is using AVC.... I wonder if this is a permanent change for them? (which would seem strange, having all launch titles be VC-1 - including Day and Date Doomsday. Then two of the three "action pack" titles use VC-1 and this one uses AVC? It doesn't make sense....)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-14-2008, 04:21 PM
Blu-News.com's Avatar
Always SpartanJohnson
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super-VHS View Post
BD 25s have one barcode 'ring' on the bottom (or back)... BD50s have two.

It's strange that Universal is using AVC.... I wonder if this is a permanent change for them? (which would seem strange, having all launch titles be VC-1 - including Day and Date Doomsday. Then two of the three "action pack" titles use VC-1 and this one uses AVC? It doesn't make sense....)
I just checked and it's one ring, compared to Miami Vice with two. As for the encode, who knows. We'll have to wait and see other upcoming releases.
__________________
www.blu-news.com RELAUNCHED and BETTER than EVER.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-14-2008, 04:26 PM
Super-VHS's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-News.com View Post
I just checked and it's one ring, compared to Miami Vice with two. As for the encode, who knows. We'll have to wait and see other upcoming releases.
Great, thanks for the info.

And yeah, I wonder about the their video codec of choice. HDD has stated that specs for Sarah Marshall, The Thing and a many other upcoming Universal releases indicate AVC so I think a change may be coming... it's just strange is all.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-14-2008, 06:07 PM
PeterB's Avatar
HDD Editor-in-Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Default

Heya

End of Days is AVC, while U-571 and Miami Vice are VC-1.

I finally got a response today from the studio's tech side as to why they have begun using two codecs:

"The reason is due to the authoring software. Sony’s Blu-print does not support all features well for VC-1. Seamless branching and multi-angle are the biggest problems on the Blu-print side. Universal titles that employ these features may end up being AVC. I believe 40 Year Old Virgin is AVC because of this."

I'm still not sure why they opted for AVC on End of Days, which has no such features?

As for the BD-25 error, it was my mistake. I updated the review.
__________________
Peter Bracke
Editor-in-Chief
High-Def Digest
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-14-2008, 06:42 PM
Super-VHS's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterB View Post
Heya

End of Days is AVC, while U-571 and Miami Vice are VC-1.

I finally got a response today from the studio's tech side as to why they have begun using two codecs:

"The reason is due to the authoring software. Sony’s Blu-print does not support all features well for VC-1. Seamless branching and multi-angle are the biggest problems on the Blu-print side. Universal titles that employ these features may end up being AVC. I believe 40 Year Old Virgin is AVC because of this."

I'm still not sure why they opted for AVC on End of Days, which has no such features?

As for the BD-25 error, it was my mistake. I updated the review.
Thanks for the info and update Peter.

Switching to AVC makes sense in the context in which they say it will be used (branching and such) I guess.... I just find it very strange that they used AVC for End of Days because it (as you say) doesn't have any of those 'special features' (heck it doesn't have any extras except a commentary...)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0