06-12-2012 12:08 PM #61
Yeah, I caught the "LV-223" reference in the movie and found it actually odd. But what you consider as a different planet, I see as a poor attempt to not be seen as a prequel and be the ultimate cause of discussions like this one.
06-12-2012 12:48 PM #62
06-12-2012 01:47 PM #63Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
06-12-2012 02:07 PM #64My mancave:
Display - Sony Bravia 3D 55HX800, Epson 3D 3020 (124")
Players - Sony BDP-S570, Sony BDP-S590, Sony PS3 320GB
Computer - Mac 27" i5 1 terabyte hdd (1 terabyte back up hdd), MacBook Pro 17" i5 750GB
Portable Devices - iPad (4th gen A6 64GB), iPod Touch (5th gen A5 32GB)
"When your winning, fight like your losing"
06-12-2012 02:28 PM #65
I think we need a term for people like Kain and Bane. We should call them Prequel Deniers. All the evidence is right there in front of them, and they refuse to see it.
06-12-2012 02:31 PM #66
I'm pretty sure his name was Butthead, and he was asking his pal Beavis.
06-12-2012 02:35 PM #67
Funny thing is? I do think it's a prequel. I was just playing devil's advocate and trying to see why wormraper thinks it is when it fits their criteria for not being one.
I do stand by my statements about the Alien, though. I don't doubt for a second that people think it is one, I doubt that people remember or really know what the Alien looks like.
06-12-2012 02:51 PM #68
It's a prequel, but a really distant one that will eventually bridge the gap to the first Alien film.
06-12-2012 03:30 PM #69
06-12-2012 03:37 PM #70Don't Reach, Young Blood
Part of The Finer Things Club, The Ghostbusters Club, The American Psycho Club, The SDF on 360 Club
06-12-2012 04:13 PM #71
06-12-2012 08:06 PM #72
My thing is, if you didn't like the movie, fine, you didn't like the movie. It isn't for everyone, but to say it is a direct prequel to a movie when it clearly has proven it is not is false. Ridley said that if he gets to do the other two movies, the third one is what will directly lead into alien. This movie was made because it was not an exact prequel. I agree the movie has faults, but you need to look at more than just the outside of the movie. On the inside, it is a brilliant film and one of the year's best (albeit, that ain't saying much)."...somewhere out there, michael bay now has the basis for his next film...and it's all your fault." - project-blu
06-13-2012 10:19 AM #73
06-13-2012 11:43 AM #74
I'm done arguing this. It is whatever you want it to be. However, a lot of the complaints Iv'e seen on this movie seem to be from not paying attention to the conversations going on. My answer to anyone that wants to know why David did something is BECAUSE HE COULD.
Anyway, Scott has announced the BD will include 20 minutes of additional footage, which is awesome. I do not know why, but the poor man always seems to get short changed with his movies hit theaters. You had Blade Runner, Legend, American Gangster, Gladiator, Kingdom of Heaven, and now Prometheus all being released the way the studio wanted in theaters and not the way Scott wanted it."...somewhere out there, michael bay now has the basis for his next film...and it's all your fault." - project-blu
06-13-2012 12:25 PM #75
Whatever, y'all. I liked 'Prometheus'.
I'm psyched about the extended 'Prometheus' though. Hopefully it'll iron out a few of the kinks people had with the characters being so underdeveloped.Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?
Anne-Marie Sakowitz: No, they all share one.
Bringing you all the best reviews of high definition entertainment.
Founded in April 2006, High-Def Digest is the ultimate guide for High-Def enthusiasts who demand only the best that money can buy. Updated daily and in real-time, we track all high-def disc news and release dates, and review the latest disc titles.
Copyright © 2012 Internet Brands, Inc. All rights reserved.