-
05-02-2012 02:52 PM #16
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 50
-
05-02-2012 03:48 PM #17
So what? Tell it to the guy looking at the shelf of TV boxsets who
1. Doesn't know what was required to bring this particular show to Blu-ray
and
2. Doesn't care what was required to bring this particular show to Blu-ray
Again, you've got to compete with the going price or your sales are going to suffer.
The Blair Witch Project cost less than half-a-million dollars to produce. John Carter cost $200 million to produce. Does the guy looking at the store shelf care? No. That's why they both cost ~$20 on Blu-ray. -
05-02-2012 05:21 PM #18
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 50
The fanboys are already hypothesizing the idea of DS9 and Voyager being remastered. Understanding the economic situation is absolutely vital for their dreams to be a reality.
You compared movie budgets in your post, but those had to be countered by box office receipts. The only way for the TNG remaster to have most of their return on investment (aside from a syndication deal, which would probably only be when all seven season are done) is through these purchases. -
05-02-2012 06:22 PM #19
The fanboys know what's up and aren't really an issue. The non-fans don't know what's up and won't become educated without an expensive campaign (that would defeat it's own purpose). "Educating" the readers of this board would surely not get us closer to that goal than would Paramount setting the kind of reasonable price-point that would prompt a lot more potential customers to jump in.
And TV shows had to be countered by broadcast advertising receipts. Six of one... -
05-02-2012 06:58 PM #20
-
05-02-2012 07:48 PM #21
I don't think those people are the target for this release, though. You're right, the average person is going to balk at an expensive price but these sets are being made for Trek fans, who Paramount knows have been following the situation and will likely understand the pricing, or just not care about the price and buy it no matter what.
-
05-02-2012 10:15 PM #22
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 720
Eh, yeah, that was his point.
Even with the additional effects work on TOS, it was nothing compared to the amount of work that has gone into TNG. - TOS was edited on film, TNG and the subsequent series, excluding Enterprise, were not. All of the film elements had to be rescanned and edited. That costs tens of thousands and episode... (remember your dealing with union work on editing, at the least)
fitprod -
05-02-2012 11:18 PM #23
-
05-03-2012 10:10 AM #24
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 779
When seasons like Supernatural, Bones or anything else that carry 22-25 Episodes, they are usually priced in the $40-$60 range TOPS. Star Trek was priced a lot of the times twice that or more, so the argument about their being 22 hours of content doesnt validate that price point at all, now I guess I can see it costing a bit more because of all the remastering being done, but these shouldnt go above $70 or so even with that, its a catalog TV show plain and simple, you can buy the whole SERIES of Farscape on Bluray for probably what one season of this will cost
-
05-03-2012 11:42 AM #25
Let's be honest, the price isn't going to be high due to the remaster. If Fox did this same process for the X-Files they wouldn't be setting the MSRP higher than for the rest of their shows. These sets will be priced high because it's Star Trek, plain and simple.
RIP Kosty you are missed. -
05-03-2012 11:47 AM #26
-
05-03-2012 12:03 PM #27Josh Z
Critic, High-Def Digest (Blog updated daily!)
Contributor, Home Theater Magazine
Curator, Laserdisc Forever | Cinema Zyberdiso.
My opinions are strictly my own, and do not necessarily reflect those of this site, its owners or employees. -
05-03-2012 01:41 PM #28
Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 779
I'm guessing not a lot of real fans bought them for that price either, I've only started getting them on DVD and thats because FOX now has them at $15 a season or so, totally worth it at that price point, $125 never! Same goes for Star Trek on Bluray, I'll just wait a while till Paramount figures out that no one is going to buy them for that much money, except for the people where money isnt an issue to blow on stuff like this....
-
05-03-2012 01:57 PM #29
Actually I did pay about $100 per season for the first five seasons, and it was worth every penny!
But again, that price wasn't based on the expenses put into it, it was based on what they thought the fair market value of the product was. When compared to the price of a film, I think $100 is an entirely fair price for a five to six disc set, each containing more content than a normal movie disc, and that's what I based my decisions on back then. That was back when releasing full seasons of shows was a new thing. Once every studio started releasing every season of every show 6 months to a year after they aired, the prices got standardized much lower, and no one compares the price of a tv season to the price of 12 films anymore, they compare it to the price of other season sets.
Were there even full season box sets available before the X-Files?RIP Kosty you are missed. -
05-03-2012 02:13 PM #30
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 720
Bringing you all the best reviews of high definition entertainment.
Founded in April 2006, High-Def Digest is the ultimate guide for High-Def enthusiasts who demand only the best that money can buy. Updated daily and in real-time, we track all high-def disc news and release dates, and review the latest disc titles.
Copyright © 2012 Internet Brands, Inc. All rights reserved.




Reply With Quote

