Reply 
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Attebery's Avatar
    Attebery is offline Editor-in-Chief
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    6,164

    Default 'The Hills Have Eyes' (1977) - High-Def Digest Review


    E has reviewed Wes Craven's 'The Hills Have Eyes.' He says this low budget film is still an entertainingly stylish picture about a deranged family of cannibals. This Blu-ray features a pretty good video transfer (except for one 15 minute long white dot!), appreciably improved audio, and a few extras. Worth a look.

    Full review here:
    http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/5368/hills_eyes_77.html
  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12

    Default wheres the 1985 sequel


    that should be a bonus disc or something. love the original
  3. #3
    cooltobeyou's Avatar
    cooltobeyou is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,640
    This movie is a classic, but I thought the transfer for this was horrid. When that white dot popped up on the screen, I seriously thought my T.V. screen was on the fritz. I thought it had a dead pixel or something. It was so annoying!
  4. #4
    eNoize's Avatar
    eNoize is online now The Professor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    4,900
    LOL, I actually thought the same thing. I even paused the movie and wiped the lens on the projector just to be sure, and the damn thing still remained. I later checked it on two other displays, and the dot was there.

    I wouldn't call it horrid, but yeah, it was pretty bad and terribly distracting.
    M. Enois Duarte
    High-Def Digest Contributor
    Hi-Def Collection
    Unfollow me at twitter: @MEnoisDuarte

    Movies are so rarely great art that if we cannot appreciate great trash
    we have very little reason to be interested in them.

    ~ Pauline Kael
    .
  5. #5
    cooltobeyou's Avatar
    cooltobeyou is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,640
    Quote Originally Posted by eNoize View Post
    LOL, I actually thought the same thing. I even paused the movie and wiped the lens on the projector just to be sure, and the damn thing still remained. I later checked it on two other displays, and the dot was there.

    I wouldn't call it horrid, but yeah, it was pretty bad and terribly distracting.
    hahah...yeah, I was very relieved to find out it was the transfer and NOT my T.V. screen. I was totally freaking out for a bit. lol.

    Also, to be fair to the movie's transfer, this was the first time I've ever seen the movie. So maybe it's never looked very good. I'm assuming it was probably a very low budget film, and this is as good as they could make it look....

    Still, when you have companies like Criterion though, who advertise in their booklets that they have "removed thousands of instances of dirt and scratches" to create a pristine transfer, it makes you wonder how a movie like "The Hills Have Eyes" could have looked even better, if a company that really cared about it would put the money behind it to make it look good.
  6. #6
    eNoize's Avatar
    eNoize is online now The Professor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    4,900
    Oh, yeah, 'HHE' is very, very low-budget and shot on Super 16. Can't realistically expect greatness in PQ department, even in the hands of Criterion. This is the best the movie's ever looked (except for that stupid white dot!) and likely the best it ever can. I can understand someone watching it for the first time and discovering the BD image doesn't compare to other films of the same period.
    M. Enois Duarte
    High-Def Digest Contributor
    Hi-Def Collection
    Unfollow me at twitter: @MEnoisDuarte

    Movies are so rarely great art that if we cannot appreciate great trash
    we have very little reason to be interested in them.

    ~ Pauline Kael
    .
  7. #7
    Adam Tyner is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by cooltobeyou View Post
    This movie is a classic, but I thought the transfer for this was horrid.
    By most accounts, this Blu-ray disc is a blatant upconversion and not genuine HD at all.

    The screenshots at http://www.kentaiblog.com/2011/08/hills-have-lies.html , if they're accurate, seem impossible to interpret any other way.

    There are a number of other super-low-budget 16mm films from the same general time period on Blu-ray right now -- Basket Case, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, and The Evil Dead, for instance -- and they're all worlds removed from this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1