Go Back   High-Def Digest Forums > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Software General Discussion
Reload this Page Blu-ray Isn't Just for Movies? Blu-Con 2010 Ends by Highlighting Blu-ray Music
Reply 
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Attebery's Avatar
    Attebery is offline Editor-in-Chief
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    6,178

    Default Blu-ray Isn't Just for Movies? Blu-Con 2010 Ends by Highlighting Blu-ray Music


    Blu-ray Isn't Just for Movies? Blu-Con 2010 Ends by Highlighting Blu-ray Music

    http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/sh...ray_Music/5774
  2. #2
    cleeve's Avatar
    cleeve is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Central Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    1,992
    I personally don't care about Blu-ray audio discs but I would LOVE to see a lot more concert films. I already own a handful (Dave Matthews/Tim Reynolds, NIN, Videogames LIVE!) but I would buy a ton if there were some available for artists I actually like.
    Blu-ray Discs Owned: 237

    Pioneer 60" Kuro 600M
    SVSound SVS-01 5.1 Surround Sound
    Onkyo SR-TX805 Receiver
    Sony PS3 Slim 120GB Console
    Microsoft Xbox 360 S 250GB Console
    Logitech Harmony 720 Universal Remote
  3. #3
    agentalbert's Avatar
    agentalbert is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    113
    I'm definitely into Blu-Ray audio, provided it is well mastered with full dynamic range. The Tom Petty "Mojo" Blu-Ray sounds fantastic, and the early reviews on "Damn The Torpedoes" are that it is just as good.
  4. #4
    Bluecow003 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1
    I absolutely love the possibilities for blu-ray audio. High fidelity music in surround sound with hardware that I already own for watching movies. How can it get better? Well it actually does because if future blu-ray audio releases are anything like what Tom Petty has already done, then they will come with the option to download lossless FLAC files of the album so you can have the music on your computer in even better quality than you could get from a CD since these FLAC files are mastered in higher resolution than what CD's put out.

    I absolutely hate the trend of digital music these days being in lossy mp3 or aac format. I refuse to pay money for lossy music when I can currently go out and buy higher quality sound from the CD and it comes with matching artwork for nearly the same price. If the music industry would finally start supporting lossless FLAC format the way Tom Petty and a few others have, then I would be very happy. Blu-ray audio releases can help make that happen.

    I'm so excited for blu-ray audio to be a widely accepted format that I bought Tom Petty's Mojo in blu-ray audio simply to support the format. I have little interest in Tom Petty, but I love having high fidelity surround music and I wish more future and past studio albums will be released or re-released this way. It's my last hope for the music industry since blu-ray audio has the potential to be a great thing given the fact that everyone with a blu-ray player for movies (and hopefully a decent associated surround sound setup of course) already has the hardware to take advantage of the format for music purposes unlike the (mostly) failed DVD-Audio and SACD formats. Not only do you get a great surround sound experience, but when they include lossless 2-channel FLAC files for you computer and other mobile devices, it's a perfect world for digital music consumption. I'm beginning to fear that more and more people are starting to accept lossy audio as the "standard" and don't even realize what good music is supposed to sound like. Blu-ray audio has the potential to show people that provided it gets marketed and supported by the industry properly. There are incredibly few reasons these days for lossy music to still be "acceptable". The only reason it ever took off in the first place is because it provided small enough files for each song to allow for relatively easy digital storage and transfer over the internet. With the size of hard drives today and the speed of broadband internet, there is no reason why FLAC should not be more widely supported. Blu-ray audio can go hand-in-hand when they are packaged together. Get a great surround sound experience and a great mobile digital sound experience packaged together. It's a great thing.

    Please make more blu-ray audio albums!
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    192
    Agreed. There's an awful lot of albums that have multi-channel mixes already done, that were released on SACD and other formats. At least some of them -- say, Dark Side of the Moon -- would probably sell enough to justify pressing them on BD.

    I'd also buy the Pixies albums, if that Minotaur monstrosity (which contained the Pixies albums on Blu Ray) came down below the $200 mark.
  6. #6
    vertigo's Avatar
    vertigo is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA (formerly of Milwaukee)
    Posts
    533
    I only own one concert disc, Dispatch: Zimbabwe, but I play it about once a month. There are other concerts/artists I'd like, but most of them are not very mainstream US artists.
    HD-DVDs: 117
    DVDs: too many to count
    Hitachi P50S602 50" Plasma 1080p
    HD-A35
    Xbox360
    Onkyo TX-SR 605
  7. #7
    jahnesta8's Avatar
    jahnesta8 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    153
    It should also allow for higher resolution stereo tracks as well as multi-channel tracks. I own many AIX recordings, including their first Blu-Ray sampler and find their stereo mixes to be significantly "better" than their 5.1 recordings (I do not have 7.1 so I cannot comment on them).

    Blu-Ray discs do not just have to be about video content, though I doubt their are many, if any, Blu-Ray disc players capable of playing resolutions higher than 192/24.
  8. #8
    Tobito is offline Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    8
    Although a world with heavenly sounding music would be one of my dreams come true, it's a very unlikely scenario: people this days don't "sit down" to listen to music, let alone to a record from beggining to end; music listening has become something that you do while you're doing something else: while you drive, while you work, while you surf the web, while you're on the toilet, etc., so you could care less about how the motherf----r sounds: it just has to fill the silence. People are content with listening lossy and loudly mastered audio thru their tiny earphones, so the music business doesn't care about improving anything (we're still getting the best audio quality from a 30 year old technology). I'm pretty sure that if internet speeds back in the day had allowed to download movies as easyly as it was for mp3s, Blu-ray wouldn't have even existed.

    On the other hand, BD music could be my worst nightmare: 7.1 channels loud as f--k! (Google "Loudness Wars" and support the cause.)
  9. #9
    Dangard Ace is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    35
    Where's my Dido Live BD Sony?
  10. #10
    Elee s is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,924
    Heres what Id like.

    A few months after artists release the album.
    Release the blu ray including every music video and concert available in HD with lossless audio. Plus a 5.1 version of every/mostly track on the album.

    Although a world with heavenly sounding music would be one of my dreams come true, it's a very unlikely scenario: people this days don't "sit down" to listen to music, let alone to a record from beggining to end;
    Very true. But with the advent of youtube vevo another increasing trend(I think) is watching the video music video as much as listening to the track. Just audio would be useless, but I think blu ray could have a chance at something if they include video in the package.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1