Quote:
Originally Posted by earthquake
You might also have your answer in your own post. RAH might not think that the use of DNR was EXCESSIVE.
It doesn't look anywhere near what was done to Patton but it's there. Sometimes you have to pick your battles.
|
Yes. I have been looking back and forth at the comparison pics and while you can detect the DNR (not really seeing EE) it is not excessive.
That said, it sucks that Universal did not maximize the BD50 and increase the bitrate on the encode. The lossless audio is a plus, but it seems this is a wash since I prefer the HD DVD video encode. I own the HD DVD and will most likely be keeping it.